:::RHMT::: Real Home Made Turbo

General Category => Engine Management => Topic started by: fe3tcourier on June 13, 2013, 06:56:25 AM

Title: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: fe3tcourier on June 13, 2013, 06:56:25 AM
(13:44:16) Bob: I had the misfortune of using a Hondata S300 the other day
(13:44:20) Bob: utter rubbish
(13:44:27) Fred: :-/
(13:44:33) Bob: the software is rubbish
(13:44:41) Bob: Crome is actually nicer to use
(13:44:47) Fred: :-)
(13:45:09) Bob: I couldn't get the car to start reliably
(13:45:23) Bob: maybe the ECU was faulty
(13:45:42) Bob: but the software didn't offer much help in diagnosing the issue

Bob is not the real name :-)

Fred. < this is, though.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Minor Threat on June 13, 2013, 11:25:22 AM
What software package out there teaches you how to tune, because that's what it sounds like he's looking for...

If you can't get a basic datalogging readout from Crome/the ECU to diag a no start, maybe "Bob" is doing something wrong?  :?:

S300 has bugs, but it does get the job done, just maybe not done "right"

I've used Crome, eCtune, Neptune and S300. eCtune probably has the best GUI, but not by much. They're all very similar pieces of software, but if you're used to Chrome then everything else does take a bit of getting used to.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Joseph Davis on June 13, 2013, 01:59:29 PM
Hondata SManager is a GUI clusterfuck compared to other OBD1 tuning options.  That said, it basically does everything exactly like all the other options (except idle control) because it's all 95% stock code.  Keep in mind Hondata SManager GUI is better than 90%anyone of all engine management options for all vehicles ever made.

Moates Demons are unreliable, which is what sold to single user eCtune/Neptune owners.  . S300s never go bad. 


Bob's commentary  reveals him as having no appreciable tuning experience, and blaming a no start problem on a viable engine management platform also speaks worlds about Bob's mechanical ability - because there's a fuel/fire/compression aka
 basic problem with the car.

However, Doug @ Hondata is a huge prick.  If Bob wishes to bash the product I have no problem, but he should be a little more subtle if he wants to be convincing.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Minor Threat on June 13, 2013, 02:26:41 PM

Moates Demons are unreliable, which is what sold to single user eCtune/Neptune owners.  . S300s never go bad. 


You're not the first person to say that, that I've read recently. In my head, Moates stuff is usually top notch and I've never had a problem with any of the Burn or Ostrich products. What went wrong with the Demon?
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Joseph Davis on June 13, 2013, 02:34:07 PM
They try new things with each design.  O2 are not bulletproof like O1, which can be reverse plugged or submersed in water without harm; O2 are very good, but failures with them do happen.  The Quarterhorse for Fords... or maybe just Clint Garrity's Binary Editor... can be a bit off to deal with, and I have had one go bad.

The nice thing about Moates gear is the warranty.  You don't even have ro have proof of purchase or anything - possession of Moates gear is your warranty.  Few companies are so excellent.

When supplies of D1 are exhausted, expect an improved D2.  Moates held off on making the Demon until all the original Neptune boards sold.  Thats how they roll.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: bigdaddyvtec on June 13, 2013, 02:37:51 PM
FUCK the Demon... Ostrich V2 and Hulog. Woing fine since day 1 with no bullshit getting it to work in the first fucking place. Ive had the misfortune of fucking with 2 demon setups. Fuck them... And Hondata
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: clwtwizted on June 13, 2013, 11:03:29 PM
Hondata will get the job done, but I still prefer Crome or Neptune. Hondata is junk in customer service and wont help out with any sort of problems unless you want to pay. I have had more issues dealing with the people at hondata just trying to get them to be nice to thier customers and ended up getting banned off of thier facebook page. Fuck Them. Get crome.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: robus on June 14, 2013, 05:21:27 AM
Hondata will get the job done, but I still prefer Crome or Neptune. Hondata is junk in customer service and wont help out with any sort of problems unless you want to pay. I have had more issues dealing with the people at hondata just trying to get them to be nice to thier customers and ended up getting banned off of thier facebook page. Fuck Them. Get crome.
To my knowledge most people seem happy with their S300. I thought you do get quick assistance through the Hondata forums? I've no experience with them, but I've checked their help forum, seemed pretty quick and helpful. Something you can't say about Crome of course, but hey it being free (or cheap) software just can't be beaten.
Other than that, Bob needs to get help, end of the story.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: PhilStubbs on June 15, 2013, 09:28:23 AM
People like Hondata cause of the name. Like JD said, the GUI sucks. The people that nutswing s300's aren't tuners. They are kids that got a phat tax return check cause they are still with their babies momma. It works though, I won't knock that. Neptune is by far my favorite tuning software. It also has everything Hondata does plus more and it's almost $100 cheaper. You are also supporting James Holy who is a super solid dude that has never tried to sue pgmfi.org. Lastly hrtuning customer service is the best I have ever encountered in my life.

While I would never use an s300 on my own car, I agree with everyone else that tuning software doesn't teach you how to tune and "Bob" needs to do done research. I have never had s300 not start just like stock no matter the injector size
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: fe3tcourier on June 15, 2013, 02:32:18 PM
Bob's commentary  reveals him as having no appreciable tuning experience, and blaming a no start problem on a viable engine management platform also speaks worlds about Bob's mechanical ability - because there's a fuel/fire/compression aka basic problem with the car.

The thing is, I know for a fact that "Bob" has upward of 10 years tuning experience on all different types of systems, and tunes dozens of cars a year, sometimes dozens a month. I respect "Bob" very highly as he is one of those rare people with a global picture of things, code, electronics, mechanics and tuning theory/practice. So, SOMETHING was going on to cause him to say these things. Unsure what. Don't really care. Trust me on "Bob"'s credentials, though :-)
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Joseph Davis on June 15, 2013, 05:39:59 PM
The consensus of this thread is that everyone from rank amateurs to folks with more experience than Bob thinks Bob is talking out of his ass.

Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: fe3tcourier on June 15, 2013, 07:58:24 PM
I've linked Bob here, we'll see what he says :-)
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Minor Threat on June 15, 2013, 08:56:26 PM
Bob's commentary  reveals him as having no appreciable tuning experience, and blaming a no start problem on a viable engine management platform also speaks worlds about Bob's mechanical ability - because there's a fuel/fire/compression aka basic problem with the car.

The thing is, I know for a fact that "Bob" has upward of 10 years tuning experience on all different types of systems, and tunes dozens of cars a year, sometimes dozens a month. I respect "Bob" very highly as he is one of those rare people with a global picture of things, code, electronics, mechanics and tuning theory/practice. So, SOMETHING was going on to cause him to say these things. Unsure what. Don't really care. Trust me on "Bob"'s credentials, though :-)

That "something" is likely outside or unrelated to a stock code based EMS solution being the issue. Or he had a bad S300 unit, shit happens.

also, fuck you Bob, you better make a n00b thread.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: 92CXyD on June 16, 2013, 01:50:54 AM
He may be dealing with CDM copies of the S300  :noel:
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Joseph Davis on June 16, 2013, 11:20:46 AM
He may be dealing with CDM copies of the S300  :noel:

From all I've gathered those work fine.  The code for the PIC security chip, as used on the S100/200 anyway, has been offered to me several times in the last decade, so its a no-brainer a clone should work fine.  There's not a whole bunch going on there.

Besides, bad S300 should go down like a bad socket - can't get a datalog. 
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: fe3tcourier on June 18, 2013, 04:51:32 AM
(01:57:48) Fred: http://www.realhomemadeturbo.com/forum/index.php/topic,22534.0.html (http://www.realhomemadeturbo.com/forum/index.php/topic,22534.0.html) < You're Bob, btw. Thoughts?
(17/06/13 00:00:01) Day changed to 17 Jun 2013
(02:56:20) Bob: my thoughts is that the particular car started and ran fine with a different ECU connected to Crome
(02:57:08) Fred: you're up late
(02:57:15) Bob: I just got home
(02:57:18) Fred: :-)
(02:58:46) Bob: and the particular S300 does communicate and all
(02:59:00) Fred: doesn't?
(02:59:05) Bob: it does
(02:59:16) Fred: woops, read "at all" not "and all"
(02:59:41) Bob: but the engine just doesn't want to start reliably, no matter what fuel injector sizing I tell it
(02:59:56) Bob: and no matter what I do to the cranking fuel tables
(03:00:45) Bob: it sometimes does start but is very inclined to stall instead of idle
(03:01:17) Fred: ok
(03:01:21) Bob: the UI of Smanager just doesn't help
(03:01:35) Bob: and the data readout is full of shit
(03:02:04) Bob: for example, I couldn't see any indication of what the actual injector pulsewidth was
(03:02:07) Bob: while cranking
(03:02:42) Fred: that's pretty poor...
(03:02:50) Bob: which is the sort of information you need to know to diagnose bad starting behaviour
(03:03:16) Bob: since it's not easy to figure out what the ECU is doing by just reading the user configurable options
(03:03:26) Fred: of course not
(03:03:42) Bob: a direct indicator of what's going on is pretty essential to have
(03:03:48) Fred: +1
(17:03:07) Fred: can i "Bob" you out of the above and paste this into that thread?
(18/06/13 00:00:04) Day changed to 18 Jun 2013
(01:06:38) Bob: yes
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: 92CXyD on June 18, 2013, 08:18:32 AM
Sounds like a similar situation I experience J1 having a dry joint, ECU solder job probably the problem.  :noel:
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Joseph Davis on June 18, 2013, 10:28:25 AM
(03:02:04) Bob: for example, I couldn't see any indication of what the actual injector pulsewidth was

Not only can injector pulse be populated in the display bar by right click-->add new gauge, it appears by default as the sixth value down on the sensors tab at the far left.  It can also be made to appear in datalogs by selecting it via template options.

(https://realhomemadeturbo.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi256.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fhh166%2Fjoeymisanthropy%2Fok_zpsbd8ffcc2.png&hash=f5d6c62fc97b6f9b7749f054cac913f61bcc48c7)

Bob needs to slow down, stop making assumptions, and start questioning the premises by which he has reached these conclusions.  Being cocky like that is old dog syndrome, and is a form of failure as it leads to cognitive breakdowns such as this.  This - tuning - is a hard way to make a living as the job is not simple, and every car is a problem car, but I'm free to be openly critical due to Bob's anonymity.  I've cleaned up a few cars in the last two years after a guy whose name I used to read in Hot Rod magazine as a teen, who has set some make-specific records.  Basic fucking errors.  In my mind he is still a legend, but he has old dog syndrome as well as the sin of pride.  I look forward to who I may one day become and I'm scared I'll turn out like him - a tired old man, a fraction of what I once was.  His polar opposite, inasmuch as I can claim any deep understanding of men met only in passing, is Bill Hendren who I met a few years before he passed.  Bill was as full of curiosity as he was knowledge.  A wise old man.

Enough philosoraptoring for this morning.  I hope you all die in a fire.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: rawr on June 18, 2013, 10:38:21 AM
Bob is Ma$e
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: fe3tcourier on June 18, 2013, 11:16:16 AM
Sounds like a similar situation I experience J1 having a dry joint, ECU solder job probably the problem.  :noel:
Quite possibly.

(16:58:19) Bob: it wasn't so much that the values weren't there, it was that they obviously weren't updating
(16:58:35) Fred: OK
(16:58:52) Fred: I think you should get a new account "Bob" and have this out with them yourself :-)
(17:02:13) Bob: like I said, it's very likely that the ECU was faulty
(17:02:19) Fred: yep
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Joseph Davis on June 18, 2013, 11:25:14 AM
Solder two 28DIP sockets together to fit Ostrich/emulator or chip in place of the S300, diagnose ECU.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: fe3tcourier on June 18, 2013, 12:06:51 PM
If they weren't updating, then likely there was no stream of usable/un-corrupt data, in which case the UI should clearly indicate that the data is stale, such as by replacing a 4.56 with -.-- etc. If a solid value was coming from within the ECU, then the UI should clearly indicate that the commands to adjust fueling parameters were failing. If they weren't failing, and data was streaming, then it's totally fucked, and a complete piece of shit, in my opinion.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Joseph Davis on June 18, 2013, 12:11:12 PM
Ivory tower, yes.  Empirically, no.  If common sense notices the datastream freezing then common sense is there is a problem.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: PhilStubbs on June 18, 2013, 12:18:59 PM
Bob is Ma$e

The shit that I have heard locally and read recently on forums.......... plus heard from JD, that could be the case. Lol
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Joseph Davis on June 18, 2013, 12:34:19 PM
The sad thing is he had an unwarranted good rep for enough years to learn the ropes.  He was a dumb frat boy when I first met him, not your typical engineering student, and its a shame he's not matured and grown since then.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Joseph Davis on June 18, 2013, 12:42:13 PM
George Carlin said something about at some point a man either reaches an age of reasoning,  or remains a fool forever.  Steve Mason's clock is running out, and it does not look good.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: fe3tcourier on June 18, 2013, 01:43:48 PM
Ivory tower, yes.  Empirically, no.  If common sense notices the datastream freezing then common sense is there is a problem.

I see three possible cases there.

1) UI/app has no data stream and displays stale data. BAD. (fault of UI/app)
2) ECU streams constant data despite seeming to take settings changes. BAD. (fault of either UI/app or ECU/architecture or both)
3) ECU streams constant data despite actually/really taking settings changes. BAD. (fault of buggy firmware, what a fucking piece of shit)

Do you see a fourth or higher order case that I don't see? There's no ivory tower, all three are practical things and failure in any of the three is a total fucking fail to me. But, I'm a professional software developer, and fucking good at it, so I do have high standards, which we may not share :-)

Fred.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: PhilStubbs on June 18, 2013, 02:56:04 PM
In my experience with s300's, they either work 100% or they don't at all. I have yet to log data and not be able to update.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Joseph Davis on June 18, 2013, 03:07:55 PM
Ivory tower, yes.  Empirically, no.  If common sense notices the datastream freezing then common sense is there is a problem.

I see three possible cases there.

1) UI/app has no data stream and displays stale data. BAD. (fault of UI/app)
2) ECU streams constant data despite seeming to take settings changes. BAD. (fault of either UI/app or ECU/architecture or both)
3) ECU streams constant data despite actually/really taking settings changes. BAD. (fault of buggy firmware, what a fucking piece of shit)

Do you see a fourth or higher order case that I don't see? There's no ivory tower, all three are practical things and failure in any of the three is a total fucking fail to me. But, I'm a professional software developer, and fucking good at it, so I do have high standards, which we may not share :-)

Fred.

Yes, but you are a bit behind the curve on hardware development, sorry.  There are very few pieces of hardware on the market without some gremlins, many of which I deal with are designed by engineers who designed ECUs for OEMs.  The yardstick I measure by is the end result of how long it takes to tune, what level of difficulty I have using it, and how long the vehicle lasts running on it.  These are the things you, your efforts, and your product will be judged on. 

No one sweats a little obvious stale data except you, and whatever pod people you come from.  And few will take your concern with such as a testament to your character.  I mean, I will, and I do, but at the end of the day I am forced to make... professional... judgements based on merit of practical application.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Joseph Davis on June 18, 2013, 03:09:22 PM
As far as personal judgements go, I'm a big fan of anal retentive pod people.  More of them should tenant this forum.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: fe3tcourier on June 18, 2013, 04:05:43 PM
Yes, but you are a bit behind the curve on hardware development, sorry.  There are very few pieces of hardware on the market without some gremlins, many of which I deal with are designed by engineers who designed ECUs for OEMs.

Honestly, I can't envisage a firmware/hardware design in which you couldn't do something to verify both a clean burn of settings and a continuous data stream. So I'd have 90%+ confidence that the software is simply crappy.

The yardstick I measure by is the end result of how long it takes to tune, what level of difficulty I have using it, and how long the vehicle lasts running on it.  These are the things you, your efforts, and your product will be judged on.

You missed one, ability to accurately dial in the car. Sure, anything worth using can do this, but many can't, all the same. Good diagnostics tools directly fit into your "difficulty using" category requiring extra thought and time to figure stuff out that'd be obvious if things were engineered properly.

No one sweats a little obvious stale data except you, and whatever pod people you come from.

I don't sweat it, unless it has my name on it, then I do sweat it.

Thanks for the anal love. Wait, that sounded wrong.

Fred.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Joseph Davis on June 18, 2013, 04:56:57 PM
It wouldn't be RHMT if it wasn't completey fucked up.   :noel:
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: HiProfile on June 18, 2013, 09:36:28 PM
When internal combustion becomes all neat and orderly, I'll be moving onto something else. Until then I'll...


(https://realhomemadeturbo.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.crucialbrutal.com%2Fsite_images%2FNEWS_jim-carrey-ride-the-snake_o_GIFSoup.com.gif&hash=e6040331e7f3ee179cf35cfe0db0d7836a568287)
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: rawr on June 18, 2013, 11:03:48 PM
This thread is brimming with hodge-podge, asspergers inspired penile comparison.


I feel it would be appropriate to use my college education in order to write clearly and concisely to convey the fact that you are both indeed, faggots. While this may not be your fault, and may be derived from the fact that your mothers didn't breast feed you, you ingested some quantity of lead as a child, or have had your intellect compromised by immunization, it does not change the fact that both of your penises are miniscule.

The problem here is clearly the fact that Bob is attempting to datalog his urethra and not his ECU.

If Bob had a clue, and a measure of technical equipment that would be appropriate for diagnosing an automobile, he'd be able to diagnose the issue without the ECU telling him the duty cycle of the injectors in one tenth of the time that it would have taken him to discuss the issue with Fred over grindr. This leads me to believe that he was attempting to seduce Fred, and the proposed technical incompetence was a form of presenting. Much like how a cat backs its furry vagnia up into the couch, the vacuum cleaners, JDs penis (yiff more, fgt).

Get it in, Fred!
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: fe3tcourier on June 19, 2013, 05:20:07 AM
ROFL :-)
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Ntrain2k on June 19, 2013, 06:55:35 AM
Holt shit I lol'd.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: bigdaddyvtec on June 19, 2013, 04:26:39 PM
S300...

Datalogging dropping, boost control not working car breaking up?


If running resistor plugs I has no clue
If running NON resistor plugs... You buy resistor pulgs. Now. All 3 issues are caused by the RF.... I know of at least 10 cars of friends displaying at least one of these issues running the R5671A x plugs in 8 and colder... ALLL had the issues. Even a very well known record holding car.


In short, fail to establish com, dropping com and "staley dan" data all rectified by going to a resistor plug. Im actuallly trying to help here, as the guy that tunes a couple of these cars is a MUCH better tuner than ID hope to be, but it was dismissed and overlooked. In the end, a good while AFTER id mentioned it as Id experienced something of the like on another ems way back, ironically I found this "fix".... where?


Hondatas forums LOL...



Fuck you
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: bigdaddyvtec on June 19, 2013, 04:30:13 PM
Oh and quit being a faggot and trying to harbor this queer... Out with his name you homo
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: fe3tcourier on June 20, 2013, 06:08:24 AM
Good stuff. You'll lol @ this:

A guy claiming to be a powertrain engineer recently posted on my forum for a few days  (until I pissed him off) and was stating that he was using solid copper core wires and had "some interference problems" ROFL. I guess it was the response to this that sealed his desire to no longer post ;-)

Fred.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: PhilStubbs on June 20, 2013, 08:26:20 AM
I was on a forum a couple months ago that had a few oem tuners on it. I couldn't believe the things I saw them talking about. The oem's would probably do better randomly picking anyone from this site to tune their stuff
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: rawr on June 20, 2013, 09:37:01 AM
Thats engineers / most professionals in general. The elite hobbiest community usually exceeds the skill of the professional community due to working in the field killing their passion/ interest.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Joseph Davis on June 20, 2013, 09:50:47 AM
Good stuff. You'll lol @ this:

A guy claiming to be a powertrain engineer recently posted on my forum for a few days  (until I pissed him off) and was stating that he was using solid copper core wires and had "some interference problems" ROFL. I guess it was the response to this that sealed his desire to no longer post ;-)

Fred.

Actually, that sounds like he was an authentic engineer.  As much as I enjoyed an engineering curriculum, and know several engineers who ain't no sippin' tea, the vast majority of them have a very poor grasp of practical matters.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Joseph Davis on June 20, 2013, 09:54:15 AM
BTW, powertrain engineer = probably a ME.  They give those guys a couple of EE classes these days as part of the ME curriculum, and because of it most of them act like they know more about EE than EEs do. 
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: fe3tcourier on June 21, 2013, 04:39:27 AM
Yeah, my thoughts was "designs bolts to hold transmission in place" :-)

BigFlabbyVirtualTechnician: BCPR7ES
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: fe3tcourier on June 21, 2013, 07:01:17 AM
http://www.hondata.com/s300_counterfeit.html (http://www.hondata.com/s300_counterfeit.html) < Perhaps this?

No, apparently not.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: rawr on June 21, 2013, 07:07:06 AM
bigflabbyvirtualtechnician. Someone call the burn ward. I think we've got a new patient.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: jabberwock on June 21, 2013, 03:36:55 PM
I have been summoned.  Fuck Hondata.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Minor Threat on June 21, 2013, 06:50:38 PM
BTW, powertrain engineer = probably a ME.  They give those guys a couple of EE classes these days as part of the ME curriculum, and because of it most of them act like they know more about EE than EEs do.

ME's act like they know more than anyone about anything, not just EE's. Dickbags, for the most part.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: rawr on June 21, 2013, 09:07:20 PM
Mes are usually total bros. Moat ees creep me rhe fuck out on the job.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: DSMR on June 30, 2013, 01:50:14 PM
BTW, powertrain engineer = probably a ME.  They give those guys a couple of EE classes these days as part of the ME curriculum, and because of it most of them act like they know more about EE than EEs do.

EE's are fucking stupid. I am one. Scary part is my job title  :mexi:
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: HiProfile on July 22, 2013, 09:32:21 PM
When people rent something at work and say to me "I can figure it out, I'm an engineer", it always gives me a chill. EVERY SINGLE one of those people calls back later saying the tool doesn't work. Then I show them how stupid they are. ;DDD

Anyone with good financing abilities can get a degree, but it takes smarts to put it to use properly. Some do, but most don't.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Joseph Davis on July 25, 2013, 11:11:10 AM
When people rent something at work and say to me "I can figure it out, I'm an engineer", it always gives me a chill.

Maybe thats why I never finished my EE.  I was too busy figuring out how things work.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: snm95ls on July 31, 2013, 11:28:37 PM
As much as I hate to say it, I like S300 better than Neptune.  The menu setup is a giant clusterfuck and some features aren't clear in their operation without doing some digging, but it works and works well.

The cars I have tuned on Neptune seemed to have odd quirks like wanting strange fuel trims to start reliably in various ambient temps, fuel cut issues, and a strange bog at WOT at the 1-2 gear change.  Maybe it's my fault, but 'i have never had issue with stock injectors and Crome like I did with stock injectors and Neptune.

'i helped a friend get a 600+ WHP running on E85 after he migrate from Neptune to Hondata.  It starts up like stock, an didn't blow up after my ham fisted self and his very inexperienced tuned on it.  He was having the same 1-2 odd isuues on Neptune, and it magically disappeared while running S300.  Could be a lot of factors, but 3 Neptune Demn setups displayed similar traits.

/i have one Demon that has worked flawlessly since day one, and another that I just sent in for RMA due to dumping the ROM periodically.

Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Minor Threat on July 31, 2013, 11:43:42 PM
As much as I hate to say it, I like S300 better than Neptune.  The menu setup is a giant clusterfuck and some features aren't clear in their operation without doing some digging, but it works and works well.

The cars I have tuned on Neptune seemed to have odd quirks like wanting strange fuel trims to start reliably in various ambient temps, fuel cut issues, and a strange bog at WOT at the 1-2 gear change.  Maybe it's my fault, but 'i have never had issue with stock injectors and Crome like I did with stock injectors and Neptune.

'i helped a friend get a 600+ WHP running on E85 after he migrate from Neptune to Hondata.  It starts up like stock, an didn't blow up after my ham fisted self and his very inexperienced tuned on it.  He was having the same 1-2 odd isuues on Neptune, and it magically disappeared while running S300.  Could be a lot of factors, but 3 Neptune Demn setups displayed similar traits.

/i have one Demon that has worked flawlessly since day one, and another that I just sent in for RMA due to dumping the ROM periodically.

I use Neptune with an Ostrich and it has been rock solid for every car I've done.

S300 I've always found to be buggy and the GUI is a clusterfuck at best but it does get the job done.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: snm95ls on July 31, 2013, 11:47:28 PM
Just different experiences sir.

I will certainly agree that the GIU is a CF.

Maybe my issues are with the way Neptune works with the Demon?

I dunno as I traded in my O1 to get a Demon (the one that still works perfectly).

Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Minor Threat on August 01, 2013, 12:31:46 AM
Just different experiences sir.

I will certainly agree that the GIU is a CF.

Maybe my issues are with the way Neptune works with the Demon?

I dunno as I traded in my O1 to get a Demon (the one that still works perfectly).

I hear less and less good things abotu the Demon.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: PhilStubbs on August 01, 2013, 07:27:32 AM
As much as I hate to say it, I like S300 better than Neptune.  The menu setup is a giant clusterfuck and some features aren't clear in their operation without doing some digging, but it works and works well.

The cars I have tuned on Neptune seemed to have odd quirks like wanting strange fuel trims to start reliably in various ambient temps, fuel cut issues, and a strange bog at WOT at the 1-2 gear change.  Maybe it's my fault, but 'i have never had issue with stock injectors and Crome like I did with stock injectors and Neptune.

'i helped a friend get a 600+ WHP running on E85 after he migrate from Neptune to Hondata.  It starts up like stock, an didn't blow up after my ham fisted self and his very inexperienced tuned on it.  He was having the same 1-2 odd isuues on Neptune, and it magically disappeared while running S300.  Could be a lot of factors, but 3 Neptune Demn setups displayed similar traits.

/i have one Demon that has worked flawlessly since day one, and another that I just sent in for RMA due to dumping the ROM periodically.

I use Neptune with an Ostrich and it has been rock solid for every car I've done.

S300 I've always found to be buggy and the GUI is a clusterfuck at best but it does get the job done.

I agree 100%, but all of my Neptune experience is with demons. Not a single issue here
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: snm95ls on August 01, 2013, 09:04:32 AM
Cool.  Guess I am i the minority as is tradition.

Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: PhilStubbs on August 01, 2013, 02:24:51 PM
I keep hearing about demons randomly shitting themselves, but I can't possibly count how many cars I have tuned with demons and not a single failure.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: snm95ls on August 01, 2013, 03:02:33 PM
BTW, powertrain engineer = probably a ME.  They give those guys a couple of EE classes these days as part of the ME curriculum, and because of it most of them act like they know more about EE than EEs do.

This is true to some extent.  The smart ones can admit when the don't know something though.  The amount of EE material ME's receive exposure to is a joke IMO.  Granted I am sure it varies by institution.

I keep hearing about demons randomly shitting themselves, but I can't possibly count how many cars I have tuned with demons and not a single failure.
 

Is it prevalent?  Dunno, but it does happen.



Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: Joseph Davis on August 01, 2013, 04:14:16 PM
Hold me.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: PhilStubbs on August 01, 2013, 04:40:05 PM
I'm not saying it doesn't happen, but with the amount of demons I have had my hands on and none if them fail? Sounds like its not much of an issue
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: bigdaddyvtec on August 02, 2013, 04:17:53 PM
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK hondata.
Title: Re: Hondata S300 = shit or good?
Post by: 92CXyD on August 03, 2013, 09:33:13 AM
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK hondata.

 :noel: