Topic: makes my peepee hard (Read 4077 times)

junkyard racer · « **on:** September 13, 2009, 08:11:30 PM »

I also would like to go to this school.

http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1175779-sam-433ci-lsx-breaks-1000hp-n.html

patsmx5 · « **Reply #1 on:** September 13, 2009, 08:18:44 PM »

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #2 on:** September 13, 2009, 08:32:43 PM »

Somebody sent me that last night. Not bad.

97Econobox · « **Reply #3 on:** September 13, 2009, 08:38:54 PM »

Fucking Nasty.

Kenny Rogers · « **Reply #4 on:** September 13, 2009, 08:44:27 PM »

15.5:1 compression and nearly 10k redline... wow.

QikEnuF · « **Reply #5 on:** September 13, 2009, 08:50:40 PM »

Wonder when S.A.M. will push their talldeck 500ci motor to those kind of extremes

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #6 on:** September 13, 2009, 08:51:57 PM »

Quote from: danwjmu on September 13, 2009, 08:42:36 PM

High rpm pushrods make my peepee hard too.

s2k would have to make 315hp just to keep up (hp/l) with that dinosaur.. awesome.

275-305, actually, depending on which S2000 engine you're calculating. Which works out the S2000 needing to make 40-45 whp over stock to match that dinosaur's specific output. Easily done with bolt ons and mild street cams on both AP1 and AP2.

I really expected something more intelligent from an engineering graduate, C average or no.

97Econobox · « **Reply #7 on:** September 13, 2009, 09:00:40 PM »

Quote from: danwjmu on September 13, 2009, 08:42:36 PM

High rpm pushrods make my peepee hard too.

s2k would have to make 315hp just to keep up (hp/l) with that dinosaur.. awesome.

ricer math dude. common you think if you put that motor in a stock camaro that a S2k would hang with it at 300 hp.

common dude.

*waits for jonny's ricer math calculator.*

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #8 on:** September 13, 2009, 09:33:11 PM »

Quote from: 97Econobox on September 13, 2009, 09:00:40 PM

Quote from: danwjmu on September 13, 2009, 08:42:36 PM
High rpm pushrods make my peepee hard too.

s2k would have to make 315hp just to keep up (hp/l) with that dinosaur.. awesome.

ricer math dude. common you think if you put that motor in a stock camaro that a S2k would hang with it at 300 hp.

common dude.

*waits for jonny's ricer math calculator.*

Henry, he said nothing of the sort. You are a fucking retard and should avoid technical discussions.

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #9 on:** September 13, 2009, 09:41:57 PM »

Quote from: danwjmu on September 13, 2009, 09:36:41 PM

Sorry for any confusion.. I just took 1000, divided by 7L, multiplied by 2.2L. Lots of rounding, lots of bullshit. Just seeing what they were talking about in the thread with "I thought 9500 was only s2000 territory LOL!!!" How much a 2.2L would have to make to be at that hp/L is all I was after.

Double check your math.

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #10 on:** September 13, 2009, 09:47:03 PM »

Your numbers are high because it's not a 7.0 liter.

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #11 on:** September 13, 2009, 09:52:25 PM »

5thgenlx · « **Reply #12 on:** September 13, 2009, 11:41:08 PM »

damnit i want endless time and money to put into my car

Loki · « **Reply #13 on:** September 14, 2009, 01:11:07 AM »

Quote from: 5thgenlx on September 13, 2009, 11:41:08 PM

damnit i want endless time and money to put into my car

Me too.

junkyard racer · « **Reply #14 on:** September 14, 2009, 08:01:55 AM »

Quote from: 5thgenlx on September 13, 2009, 11:41:08 PM

damnit i want endless time and money to put into my car

sponsors also would help with that.

SgtB · « **Reply #15 on:** September 14, 2009, 08:06:18 PM »

Quote

275-305, actually, depending on which S2000 engine you're calculating. Which works out the S2000 needing to make 40-45 whp over stock to match that dinosaur's specific output. Easily done with bolt ons and mild street cams on both AP1 and AP2.

What bolt ons? 40hp is a fuckload n/a with an f20. I'm not trying to talk shit, but if you know an easy mod for 40hp that doesn't involve itb's or a longer stroke, I honestly want to know.

LS1pwNzJ00 · « **Reply #16 on:** September 14, 2009, 08:17:37 PM »

LSx are the best, and shit on everything all day any day. HP/L is ricer math and stupid bullshit, Hondas fall far short of the awesome greatness that is the LSx

bouncinofftherevlimiter · « **Reply #17 on:** September 15, 2009, 01:51:37 AM »

Quote from: LS1pwNzJ00 on September 14, 2009, 08:17:37 PM

LSx are the best, and shit on everything all day any day. HP/L is ricer math and stupid bullshit, Hondas fall far short of the awesome greatness that is the LSx

QFT :yes:

2000h22a · « **Reply #18 on:** September 15, 2009, 04:53:44 AM »

Quote from: SgtB on September 14, 2009, 08:06:18 PM

Quote
275-305, actually, depending on which S2000 engine you're calculating. Which works out the S2000 needing to make 40-45 whp over stock to match that dinosaur's specific output. Easily done with bolt ons and mild street cams on both AP1 and AP2.

What bolt ons? 40hp is a fuckload n/a with an f20. I'm not trying to talk shit, but if you know an easy mod for 40hp that doesn't involve itb's or a longer stroke, I honestly want to know.

full exhaust, intake manifold, intake, and a decent tuner could squeeze something close to that out. whatever it may lack, just make up with some spray :yes:

SgtB · « **Reply #19 on:** September 15, 2009, 05:43:16 PM »

Without FI or spray no. A few grand in exhaust and intake will net you 10~15whp on an f20 in the midrange and very little peak. The motor is pretty maxed out from the factory. Boost is a different animal. inlinePro has a 930+rwhp engine right now with a gt42 on it.

Conceptz-X · « **Reply #20 on:** September 15, 2009, 06:32:09 PM »

Pusrod technology also allows much more rocker ratio tuning than with OHC. You can have a ratio of 2.5if you wanted so open/close rates are very high

I have some Jesel 2.2's for if I ever build a SBF with CHI heads.

97Econobox · « **Reply #21 on:** September 15, 2009, 06:40:46 PM »

KNow whats funny bout the SBC? Its younger than an OHc engine. OHc engines were usedin racing in the teens and used mass production in the 20's, that SBC that was made in 1955. I dont get why folks think OHC engines are like a newer design than SBC's

ryan89crx · « **Reply #22 on:** September 15, 2009, 07:07:18 PM »

Quote from: 2000h22a on September 15, 2009, 04:53:44 AM

full exhaust, intake manifold, intake, and a decent tuner could squeeze something close to that out. whatever it may lack, just make up with some spray :yes:

who the fuck are you and where is your intro thread?

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #23 on:** September 15, 2009, 09:31:58 PM »

Quote from: SgtB on September 15, 2009, 05:43:16 PM

Without FI or spray no. A few grand in exhaust and intake will net you 10~15whp on an f20 in the midrange and very little peak. The motor is pretty maxed out from the factory. Boost is a different animal. inlinePro has a 930+rwhp engine right now with a gt42 on it.

Nobody touches cam timing, though. Or do they?

Those motors love compression.

Robb · « **Reply #24 on:** September 15, 2009, 09:36:34 PM »

Not bad at all.

A local guy put down 612whp on a mustang dyne thru a powerglide and ford 9" with 28" slicks at what was roughly 14:1 static compression on a 351w svo block. Ported the heads and milled the pistons by hand.

2000h22a · « **Reply #25 on:** September 16, 2009, 03:05:08 AM »

Quote from: ryan89crx on September 15, 2009, 07:07:18 PM

Quote from: 2000h22a on September 15, 2009, 04:53:44 AM
full exhaust, intake manifold, intake, and a decent tuner could squeeze something close to that out. whatever it may lack, just make up with some spray :yes:
who the fuck are you and where is your intro thread?

making it now

SgtB · « **Reply #26 on:** September 16, 2009, 07:09:11 PM »

Quote from: Joseph Davis on September 15, 2009, 09:31:58 PM

Nobody touches cam timing, though. Or do they?

Those motors love compression.

I honestly can't say. I've yet to see anyone get much out of the cams worth writing about, but I could be wrong. The valves are pretty close to interference stock, so it's limited. There are a few mystical cams made by a friend of a friends tuner that eek out power, but I never see anything concrete, or repeatable. I haven't seen too many extravagant builds that bump compression, most people just stroke it to 2.3, and sometimes 2.7L, and slap some ITB's on it. Those motors pump out 300whp+ which is pretty nice considering. I just boost the damn thing and still come out ahead of the N/A guys.

There is a ivtec f20-22 right now. Supposedly it makes good power. The guy isn't talking right now because of a magazine deal, so I hope he's not just talking garbage.

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #27 on:** September 16, 2009, 07:20:15 PM »

i-VTECing an S2000 is a hype maneuver. The way you row the gearbox on those things, the VTC can't keep up.

SgtB · « **Reply #28 on:** September 16, 2009, 08:41:05 PM »

I agree. The way you drive an S is balls out. Everyone bitches about the bottom end, but the car stays above 6k if your beating it right. I just thought it was neat as a technical challenge.

Can I tell you, my 9lbs flywheel and HDSS clutch makes for some stupid fast shifts without even slamming it. Not to mention a counter sunk shiftknob on an already short shifting transmission turns it into a toggle switch. I can hit all six gears with my arm resting on the console. :yes:

News:

Author Topic: makes my peepee hard (Read 4077 times)

junkyard racer

QikEnuF

junkyard racer