And yet that is perfectly fine as that is the benefit of freedom. I suppose we should execute marshal law and become a communist tyrant based gov also?
i agree, up until the point where someone exercising their freedom to be a fucking slob starts costing me money. you can quip slippery slope fallacies all day long, but it doesn't change the fact that when people make decisions that significantly affect others negatively, a line should be drawn. why do you think we pay policemen to ticket us when we speed? we are allowed the freedom to make that decision, but there's a penalty to pay when it has the potential to hurt others.
I would love to know how you would do this. The premise of it makes no sense. Who is going to decide what is healthy and what isn't? Tobacco, food products, alcohol, drugs (legal and non), activities, education, area you live etc etc, as you see it starts to snowball on what is "healthy". Not only that buy when there is a system setup this way do you honestly think it's going to be to better the people? No; it's going to be to line the pockets of the gov and corporations.
the premise makes perfect sense, and it would be fairly easy to implement. 1. sales tax inversely proportional to nutritional value for foods (index based on total calories, grams of sugar, grams of fiber, grams of fat, etc). 2. use additional sales tax from unhealthy foods to subsidize healthy foods, making them the more financially appealing choice. honestly, one of the reasons why americans are so overweight is that shit food is substantially cheaper than good food.
Do you lack the understanding the we as a people just don't care? Seriously there is no big scandal hiding the unhealthy choices we make everyday. EVERYONE knows them; the fact is we simply don't give two shits. Point being: Cigarettes kill half a million people each year and it's a known fact they cause cancer. Want to guess how many Americans smoke?
six?
my understanding is that when people 'don't care' to a big enough degree that their complacence affects others negatively, we should do something. i merely asked questions above, pointing out that someone will inevitably find somethign to bitch about (someone sure did, didn't they?).
this kind of touches on something i talked about in one of the toyota threads- dumbfuck drivers kill more than 5 times more people each year than drunk drivers, yet we tolerate dumbfucks and crucify drunks, despite dumbfucks being a bigger threat, which brings me back to...
And yet that is perfectly fine as that is the benefit of freedom. I suppose we should execute marshal law and become a communist tyrant based gov also?
you'd be surprised how quickly 'freedom' evaporates when you're 600lbs, bankrupt and dragging everyone else down with you.