:::RHMT::: Real Home Made Turbo

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Official RHMT TANK! that's right i said a TANK! (link)

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 2003 Cadillac w/ a 572  (Read 3066 times)

Sinister

  • insane in the membrane
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 21489
2003 Cadillac w/ a 572
« on: July 11, 2009, 01:54:51 AM »
« Last Edit: July 11, 2009, 02:10:53 AM by Sinister »
Logged
Join Date: 12-31-2003
Posts: 20174
3/5/09 - RIP HMT

random-strike

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 19564
Re: 2003 Cadillac w/ a 572
« Reply #1 on: July 11, 2009, 02:09:47 AM »
cool
Logged
Double doors, marble floors, naked hoes around me

88dx

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7885
Re: 2003 Cadillac w/ a 572
« Reply #2 on: July 11, 2009, 02:19:29 AM »
Thats badass, Anything other then the POS Northstar in those is pretty cool.
Logged

keelay

  • Cheddar Bob
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2333
  • Function>Form
Re: 2003 Cadillac w/ a 572
« Reply #3 on: July 12, 2009, 05:34:32 PM »
that will confuse you. my mind was arguing with itself about what it was seeing, and hearing.....badass. loss of points for a "performance shop" dropping in a fucking CRATE motor, that required what, a fuel pressure reg, some mounts, hose re routing, and like 4 wires to make it run? un-original, lack of vision.
 
Quote from: 88dx on July 11, 2009, 02:19:29 AM
Thats badass, Anything other then the POS Northstar in those is pretty cool.

nigga, you kiddin?? sandrail guys love those northstar motors. light weight, and they can make some WICKED fucking power. and despite some issues that did in fact plague them, the motors were making tech leaps while everyone just stuck with what they had. at least cadillac is willing to take a risk and make technology available. remember, it was caddy that brought out the ohv when everyone still like them flatheads
Logged
The 2 fat bitches from the internet fucked me. Except for one, she didn'#039#039t.

Ntrain2k

  • Global Moderator
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3016
Re: 2003 Cadillac w/ a 572
« Reply #4 on: July 12, 2009, 06:33:44 PM »
Quote from: keelay on July 12, 2009, 05:34:32 PM
that will confuse you. my mind was arguing with itself about what it was seeing, and hearing.....badass. loss of points for a "performance shop" dropping in a fucking CRATE motor, that required what, a fuel pressure reg, some mounts, hose re routing, and like 4 wires to make it run? un-original, lack of vision.

I guess you missed the fabrication required to convert that pig over to RWD as well?
Logged

Joseph Davis

  • Verbal Assault Technician
  • RHMT Moderator
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34733
  • Eugenics prevents retards like widebody93
    • TURBO THIS
Re: 2003 Cadillac w/ a 572
« Reply #5 on: July 12, 2009, 08:34:54 PM »
I'd bet money that chassis is offered in a RWD flavor, and the work while notable is not extensive.
Logged

dvst8r

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3737
  • Unobtainium
Re: 2003 Cadillac w/ a 572
« Reply #6 on: July 12, 2009, 08:47:06 PM »
The video would have been so much better without narration.

Is it just me or did it sound like open headers? I saw the exhaust tips there, but it really didn't sound like that was where it was coming from. I agree with the general consensus here that, it is cool, but not all that special in the fab department. Highrolle'rs TPRC was more extensive in the fab department.
Logged
There are two kinds of people: Sheep and sharks. Sharks are winners and they don'#039#039t look back '#039#039cause they don'#039#039t have necks. Necks are for sheep.

Corey

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3030
Re: 2003 Cadillac w/ a 572
« Reply #7 on: July 12, 2009, 08:47:29 PM »
Quote from: Joseph Davis on July 12, 2009, 08:34:54 PM
I'd bet money that chassis is offered in a RWD flavor, and the work while notable is not extensive.

i would be willing to take the money from you, sir.
Logged

hotrex

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13021
  • rough riding niggas since 2002
Re: 2003 Cadillac w/ a 572
« Reply #8 on: July 12, 2009, 09:05:26 PM »
i will also like part of said monies
Logged
1. nbspnbsp choda nbspnbsp 584 up, 134 down
 area between your bag and your asshole
Johnny bliss'#039#039s mom really worked my choda yesterday, I wont be able to ride my bike for a week

Ntrain2k

  • Global Moderator
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3016
Re: 2003 Cadillac w/ a 572
« Reply #9 on: July 12, 2009, 10:38:34 PM »
Logged

dvst8r

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3737
  • Unobtainium
Re: 2003 Cadillac w/ a 572
« Reply #10 on: July 12, 2009, 10:48:39 PM »
Logged
There are two kinds of people: Sheep and sharks. Sharks are winners and they don'#039#039t look back '#039#039cause they don'#039#039t have necks. Necks are for sheep.

E-b0la

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2276
Re: 2003 Cadillac w/ a 572
« Reply #11 on: July 14, 2009, 02:49:09 AM »
Quote from: Corey on July 12, 2009, 08:47:29 PM
Quote from: Joseph Davis on July 12, 2009, 08:34:54 PM
I'd bet money that chassis is offered in a RWD flavor, and the work while notable is not extensive.

i would be willing to take the money from you, sir.

those caddies are FWD. My grandfather had one, and I did the oil change on it and was stunned when I saw the v8 sitting sideways in the engine bay.
Logged

Tim

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2632
Re: 2003 Cadillac w/ a 572
« Reply #12 on: July 14, 2009, 09:41:05 AM »
Quote from: E-b0la on July 14, 2009, 02:49:09 AM
Quote from: Corey on July 12, 2009, 08:47:29 PM
Quote from: Joseph Davis on July 12, 2009, 08:34:54 PM
I'd bet money that chassis is offered in a RWD flavor, and the work while notable is not extensive.

i would be willing to take the money from you, sir.

those caddies are FWD. My grandfather had one, and I did the oil change on it and was stunned when I saw the v8 sitting sideways in the engine bay.
They are front wheel drive, I have one right now.

But I believe the point is with all manufacturing the more machines that use the same part the less stock and cheaper more efficient it is to build.  (think how easy it is that all honda's use the same basic sensors/ ecu pinouts/ distributor guts/ style of mounting engines so with the right stock pieces you can pretty much bolt any drivetrain into any similar year car swap ecu's etc with little to no brain or fab work)
So it would not be a stretch to think GM has a different platform that shares the same basic chassis that is also RWD that parts could be stolen from, though I haven't the slightest idea if it does exist and if it does what or where it is.
Logged

Lowerit

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 101185
Re: 2003 Cadillac w/ a 572
« Reply #13 on: July 14, 2009, 09:44:03 AM »
Later ones are offered in RWD and AWD .. Older are  FWD Headgasket eating barges.

I used to write the Sales brochures for GM ...most boring job ever.
Logged
fuck you

Joseph Davis

  • Verbal Assault Technician
  • RHMT Moderator
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34733
  • Eugenics prevents retards like widebody93
    • TURBO THIS
Re: 2003 Cadillac w/ a 572
« Reply #14 on: July 14, 2009, 10:03:44 AM »
I made my statement based on the Azera being a FWD offering in a RWD Holden chassis, known to us in the US as the GTO.  I very much wouldn't be surprised to find it's very RWD compatible, or that you can drill the poprivets out of the transmission tunnel of it's RWD variant and have a no brainer install.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »