Topic: For CoreyR: The Way It Should Be (Read 7072 times)

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #1 on:** July 31, 2009, 10:27:08 AM »

SUHC > Quad cam complexity.

dvst8r · « **Reply #2 on:** July 31, 2009, 10:29:24 AM »

Just says "database error" when I vote ?

dueyx99 · « **Reply #3 on:** July 31, 2009, 10:31:27 AM »

is that a windsor or a punched out 302

Ntrain2k · « **Reply #4 on:** July 31, 2009, 10:36:10 AM »

Quote from: dueyx99 on July 31, 2009, 10:31:27 AM

is that a windsor or a punched out 302

A 302 is a windsor......

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #5 on:** July 31, 2009, 10:47:08 AM »

Stroked 351W. Comes in right at or under 400cid.

There's no replacement for displacement, screw a 289 cid toy motor.

dueyx99 · « **Reply #6 on:** July 31, 2009, 10:56:55 AM »

what's it got for horsepressure

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #7 on:** July 31, 2009, 11:14:23 AM »

Not enough. If Goforth gets it the plan is to max that setup and work on the suspension @ the track, eventually turn it into a 10.5 Outlaw.

highroller54 · « **Reply #8 on:** July 31, 2009, 12:15:28 PM »

when I tire of dealing with 16 year old kids in the honda scene, this will be my next build. I like the sn mustang if done right.

Robb · « **Reply #9 on:** July 31, 2009, 12:35:41 PM »

Where in the flat-landed hell is that?

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #10 on:** July 31, 2009, 01:55:20 PM »

salesmonkey · « **Reply #11 on:** July 31, 2009, 02:31:16 PM »

i seen a guy the other day with a 5.8 badge on his mustang instead of a 5.0

made me laugh a bit that he actually changed it. i would of kept the 5.0 to keep people from talking to me.

trevor72 · « **Reply #12 on:** July 31, 2009, 02:46:39 PM »

i like how it clears the factory early cobra hood.

turbo looks small. very small infact for what that motor is.

what head is on it?

Robb · « **Reply #13 on:** July 31, 2009, 03:21:24 PM »

Quote from: salesmonkey on July 31, 2009, 02:31:16 PM

i seen a guy the other day with a 5.8 badge on his mustang instead of a 5.0

made me laugh a bit that he actually changed it. i would of kept the 5.0 to keep people from talking to me.

Overcompensation.

DRQPQUT · « **Reply #14 on:** July 31, 2009, 03:37:17 PM »

;D I LIKE!!!!!!!!!!!!

Corey · « **Reply #15 on:** July 31, 2009, 03:50:02 PM »

was the owner of that a honda owner at one point? i like the jdm angled intercooler. looks like a profail core.

that turbo is sweet too, what is it a 42/48?

my car > that car

how fast did that turd go?

Robb · « **Reply #16 on:** July 31, 2009, 04:07:43 PM »

Whats up with the upper IC piping? Also, I detect some ghetto wiring, relay w/spade connectors in the vicinty of the MSD box.

Whats it running FAST? DFI?

98redcavz24 · « **Reply #17 on:** July 31, 2009, 05:03:10 PM »

looks like a 61mm or close. woulda just went big single on that stock cubed motor or 2.2 kb

. they can take a fuckton of abuse

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #18 on:** July 31, 2009, 05:26:53 PM »

Quote from: Corey on July 31, 2009, 03:50:02 PM

was the owner of that a honda owner at one point? i like the jdm angled intercooler. looks like a profail core.

that turbo is sweet too, what is it a 42/48?

my car > that car

how fast did that turd go?

Looks like a 600+ whp turbo to me. That's a mid 10 in that chassis at 135-136 mph. You do, what, 126 mph?

dvst8r · « **Reply #19 on:** July 31, 2009, 05:44:22 PM »

Quote from: Joseph Davis on July 31, 2009, 05:26:53 PM

Quote from: Corey on July 31, 2009, 03:50:02 PM
was the owner of that a honda owner at one point? i like the jdm angled intercooler. looks like a profail core.

that turbo is sweet too, what is it a 42/48?

my car > that car

how fast did that turd go?

Looks like a 600+ whp turbo to me. That's a mid 10 in that chassis at 135-136 mph. You do, what, 126 mph?

What kinda crappy suspension setup is that thing running to only go mid 10's @ 135mph that sounds like a FWD not a RWD.

LS1pwNzJ00 · « **Reply #20 on:** July 31, 2009, 05:52:57 PM »

Quote from: dvst8r on July 31, 2009, 05:44:22 PM

Quote from: Joseph Davis on July 31, 2009, 05:26:53 PM
Quote from: Corey on July 31, 2009, 03:50:02 PM
was the owner of that a honda owner at one point? i like the jdm angled intercooler. looks like a profail core.

that turbo is sweet too, what is it a 42/48?

my car > that car

how fast did that turd go?

Looks like a 600+ whp turbo to me. That's a mid 10 in that chassis at 135-136 mph. You do, what, 126 mph?

What kinda crappy suspension setup is that thing running to only go mid 10's @ 135mph that sounds like a FWD not a RWD.

It doesnt even need suspension, it rides and is suspended on JD's hopes and dreams of how he vicariously lives through the cars he tunes. It has so much torque that JD's combover blew off to the side.

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #21 on:** July 31, 2009, 05:53:41 PM »

It was what the orange SN99 convertable with the 3.8, blower, and spray from Pinks @ Rockingham lays to the wheels. If you remember the thread, he was the one we were worried about because that car had been together forever and was super repeatable, and the driver didn't suck.

slaminsam · « **Reply #22 on:** July 31, 2009, 07:05:39 PM »

Quote from: Joseph Davis on July 31, 2009, 10:47:08 AM

There's no replacement for displacement, screw a 289 cid toy motor.

4.6 mod motor= 281 ci

but the statement still remains true.

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #23 on:** July 31, 2009, 10:32:27 PM »

125 mph traps = 600cc crotch rocket.

88dx · « **Reply #24 on:** July 31, 2009, 10:45:57 PM »

Quote from: Joseph Davis on July 31, 2009, 10:32:27 PM

125 mph traps = 600cc crotch rocket,that can also turn unlike the shit box in the first post

:yes:

Corey · « **Reply #25 on:** July 31, 2009, 10:46:21 PM »

Quote from: Joseph Davis on July 31, 2009, 10:32:27 PM

125 mph traps = 600cc crotch rocket.

not from a roll.

my car has stock manifolds, cats. 10psi pulley on the smallest blower procharger offers for my application and a terrible tune. ricer talk.

i would sure as hell hope big displacement motor with a turbo and probably an auto trans would be faster. too bad that car still sucks and the owner is a queer if he didnt buy that car as a roller and stuff that boat anchor in there as opposed to pulling out a motor thats much more capable of making reliable easy power.

joey dont hate on the mod motors, they are the real deal.

fysh · « **Reply #26 on:** July 31, 2009, 11:10:06 PM »

Mod motors are fucking gay, and mine is bigger than yours. EAT COCK.

Actually, I would love ported Navi heads + turbo.

Corey · « **Reply #27 on:** July 31, 2009, 11:13:38 PM »

Quote from: fysh on July 31, 2009, 11:10:06 PM

Mod motors are fucking gay, and mine is bigger than yours. EAT COCK.

Actually, I would love ported Navi heads + turbo.

bigger fail maybe.

4 cams is better then 2

LS1pwNzJ00 · « **Reply #28 on:** July 31, 2009, 11:16:43 PM »

people people, cant we all just agree that LSx engines blow ford engines out of the water. Because it is the truth.

Corey · « **Reply #29 on:** July 31, 2009, 11:21:48 PM »

ill go with a big negative there, not to mention the t56 thats attached to a LSx is complete fail compared to the t56 attached to the modular. plus 10 bolt rears are about as useless as they come.

1 right doesnt outweight multiple wrongs.

News:

Poll

Answer pls

Author Topic: For CoreyR: The Way It Should Be (Read 7072 times)