Topic: Ranger fail.... edit: its f/s if anyone needs parts lol (Read 8924 times)

turbostd · « **on:** October 11, 2009, 11:09:37 PM »

So i was putting brakes on my friend kyles 98 ranger when i found this on the passenger side

Yes that is a bolt welded to the uca holding it to the frame

We tried to weld the crack up but keep blowing through the frame lol. On top of that moving the rubber brake line half an inch to the left cause the metal line under the truck to start leaking.

Ravage70 · « **Reply #1 on:** October 11, 2009, 11:25:26 PM »

98 or 89?
That think looks like a deathtrap.

snm95ls · « **Reply #2 on:** October 11, 2009, 11:27:38 PM »

We had one come into work one day with the rear leaf spring shackle mounts rusted off of the frame. It was a death for sure.

Just a rusty pile of fuck.

turbostd · « **Reply #3 on:** October 11, 2009, 11:32:39 PM »

ya its kinda sad really the body is almost perfect on the thing yet the underside is done. His s10 was the opposite the body was toast but the frame and running gear was perfect lol

t_cel_t · « **Reply #4 on:** October 12, 2009, 12:47:20 AM »

ford=fail

brine04 · « **Reply #5 on:** October 12, 2009, 12:57:34 AM »

Quote from: t_cel_t on October 12, 2009, 12:47:20 AM

ford=fail

+1

bigdaddyvtec · « **Reply #6 on:** October 12, 2009, 01:32:26 AM »

Just sold my 93 with 58K on the clock last night.

Good by FORD, Hello Isuzu... PIcs to come. Have 3 hhundo or so in the Ranger, Got 2 Gs for it. Picking up a 94 Isuzu Rodeo SPort with V6, NEw clutch, really clean new oversize tires and shit... REALLY dont want to get sticuk in some fucking gay ass winter like last year up here without 4WD...

Id have kept the ranger if it was 4wd... But its Not... The leafspring thing is known about them...

That thikng looks like shit underneath, mine looks (looked) fine

rawr · « **Reply #7 on:** October 12, 2009, 06:37:35 AM »

Welcome to Ohio, salt and the reason I don't want to own any more old shit up here. $:-\$

E-b0la · « **Reply #8 on:** October 12, 2009, 10:17:35 AM »

northeast = rust

that sucks. Just sell the truck to some schmuck get something else before it fails again.

Robb · « **Reply #9 on:** October 12, 2009, 10:19:55 AM »

Quote from: t_cel_t on October 12, 2009, 12:47:20 AM

ford=fail

Right, thats why there are more mustangs running sub 10 second 1/4 times than any car on the planet.

t_cel_t · « **Reply #10 on:** October 12, 2009, 11:46:00 AM »

Quote from: bigdaddyvtec on October 12, 2009, 01:32:26 AM

Just sold my 93 with 58K on the clock last night.

Good by FORD, Hello Isuzu... PIcs to come. Have 3 hhundo or so in the Ranger, Got 2 Gs for it. Picking up a 94 Isuzu Rodeo SPort with V6, NEw clutch, really clean new oversize tires and shit... REALLY dont want to get sticuk in some fucking gay ass winter like last year up here without 4WD...

Id have kept the ranger if it was 4wd... But its Not... The leafspring thing is known about them...

That thikng looks like shit underneath, mine looks (looked) fine

you know thats a gm right

turbostd · « **Reply #11 on:** October 12, 2009, 12:05:47 PM »

didnt some of those Isuzus have honda motors in them

anyhow the Isuzus seem pretty nice a friend of mine has a 95 trooper with the 3.2 sohc v6. Runs good and has decent power but the valvetrain is noisy as hell. Wonder how those motors would do with boost? They have the gm 60 degree trans pattern and i have a 92 s10 that has a failtastic 2.8 in it that needs some loven.

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #12 on:** October 12, 2009, 12:36:02 PM »

Quote from: n/a michael on October 12, 2009, 11:27:51 AM

Quote from: Robb on October 12, 2009, 10:19:55 AM
Quote from: t_cel_t on October 12, 2009, 12:47:20 AM
ford=fail

Right, thats why there are more mustangs running sub 10 second 1/4 times than any car on the planet.
any car can be built with AFTERMARKET parts to run fast.

Yeah, but stock 351W still eat 700 whp all day long, so take the hater cock out of your ass. There's a lot that's RIGHT with Fords, I'd rather own one than a newer Honda.

Quote from: turbostd on October 12, 2009, 12:05:47 PM

didnt some of those Isuzus have honda motors in them

None.

patsmx5 · « **Reply #13 on:** October 12, 2009, 12:40:28 PM »

Some honda's had isuzu engines, but not the other way around.

Ford has done a lot right. Yes the've built their fair share of shit and then some. But a lot of their trucks are purpose built and very stout from the factory. And +1 to the mustang, they've done a lot right with it too.

patsmx5 · « **Reply #14 on:** October 12, 2009, 12:46:36 PM »

Quote from: Joseph Davis on October 12, 2009, 12:36:02 PM

Yeah, but stock 351W still eat 700 whp all day long

Really?

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #15 on:** October 12, 2009, 01:56:04 PM »

Quote from: patsmx5 on October 12, 2009, 12:46:36 PM

Quote from: Joseph Davis on October 12, 2009, 12:36:02 PM
Yeah, but stock 351W still eat 700 whp all day long
Really?

Look up "football rod" truck blocks. And yeah, they'll make that power, but stock piston reliability is like a 350 whp GSR's... they last for a while, or not, and then the lands go.

Robb · « **Reply #16 on:** October 12, 2009, 03:46:23 PM »

Quote from: Joseph Davis on October 12, 2009, 01:56:04 PM

Quote from: patsmx5 on October 12, 2009, 12:46:36 PM
Quote from: Joseph Davis on October 12, 2009, 12:36:02 PM
Yeah, but stock 351W still eat 700 whp all day long
Really?

Look up "football rod" truck blocks. And yeah, they'll make that power, but stock piston reliability is like a 350 whp GSR's... they last for a while, or not, and then the lands go.

Then you buy $150 worth of forged pistons and some MHG's, turn the boost up and laugh at faggot slow literbikes as you pass them with the entire cast of 90210 in your car.

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #17 on:** October 12, 2009, 04:40:57 PM »

I didn't know you could be picky about what you drive on your budget, Michael.

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #18 on:** October 12, 2009, 04:46:09 PM »

I never bought tires, Michael. That was the problem.

Robb · « **Reply #19 on:** October 12, 2009, 05:50:08 PM »

Quote from: n/a michael on October 12, 2009, 04:44:21 PM

Quote from: Joseph Davis on October 12, 2009, 04:40:57 PM
I didn't know you could be picky about what you drive on your budget, Michael.
cars that break down a lot (fords) cost more to own cause you are always fixing something.

Sir, here you suggest that fords are unreliable. The question I pose to you is, what exactly is considered reliable in this day and age? They dont make 92-95 civics anymore...

LS1pwNzJ00 · « **Reply #20 on:** October 12, 2009, 06:36:07 PM »

Quote from: Joseph Davis on October 12, 2009, 12:36:02 PM

Quote from: n/a michael on October 12, 2009, 11:27:51 AM
Quote from: Robb on October 12, 2009, 10:19:55 AM
Quote from: t_cel_t on October 12, 2009, 12:47:20 AM
ford=fail

Right, thats why there are more mustangs running sub 10 second 1/4 times than any car on the planet.
any car can be built with AFTERMARKET parts to run fast.

Yeah, but stock 351W still eat 700 whp all day long, so take the hater cock out of your ass. There's a lot that's RIGHT with Fords, I'd rather own one than a ANY HONDA

Fixed. I hate fords because they are designed so fucking retarded, not that GM's are designed much better, but they are designed a bit better. the only ford i'd own is a 03-04 cobra. Fuck everything else

patsmx5 · « **Reply #21 on:** October 12, 2009, 06:43:19 PM »

I like the early/mid 90's F series fords. We've got a 93' F150 with ~190K on the odometer. Truck is hauling something whenever it's running, gets about 10K a year put on it, and it never complains. Everything int he fucker is stock, never done shit to it. A/C is ford cold, 351 pulls good. Hasn't had an oil change in years, but it doesn't complain. Ford ain't got a conscious. Just runs.

bluerex · « **Reply #22 on:** October 12, 2009, 07:01:02 PM »

I've been beating the shit out of '80's fords from the beginning and probably will for the next 10 years. I've sunk a total of probably less than $400 (including purchase) in my dd '83 ranger in the last two years.

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #23 on:** October 12, 2009, 07:24:59 PM »

Quote from: Robb on October 12, 2009, 05:50:08 PM

Quote from: n/a michael on October 12, 2009, 04:44:21 PM
Quote from: Joseph Davis on October 12, 2009, 04:40:57 PM
I didn't know you could be picky about what you drive on your budget, Michael.
cars that break down a lot (fords) cost more to own cause you are always fixing something.

Sir, here you suggest that fords are unreliable. The question I pose to you is, what exactly is considered reliable in this day and age? They dont make 92-95 civics anymore...

The question I pose Michael is why the fuck did he buy a Ford Falcon if he hates them so much?

turbostd · « **Reply #24 on:** October 12, 2009, 10:19:26 PM »

heres some pics from underneath lol this frame is done for. I told him to ether look for another frame or another truck that needs a motor or trans haha.

Robb · « **Reply #25 on:** October 13, 2009, 08:39:13 AM »

Quote from: n/a michael on October 13, 2009, 01:40:25 AM

Quote from: Joseph Davis on October 12, 2009, 07:24:59 PM
Quote from: Robb on October 12, 2009, 05:50:08 PM
Quote from: n/a michael on October 12, 2009, 04:44:21 PM
Quote from: Joseph Davis on October 12, 2009, 04:40:57 PM
I didn't know you could be picky about what you drive on your budget, Michael.
cars that break down a lot (fords) cost more to own cause you are always fixing something.

Sir, here you suggest that fords are unreliable. The question I pose to you is, what exactly is considered reliable in this day and age? They dont make 92-95 civics anymore...

The question I pose Michael is why the fuck did he buy a Ford Falcon if he hates them so much?

it's a fairlane old man, i didn't buy it my wife did. she bought it cause she liked the way it looked.
now she wants to sell it cause it's a pos

robb: i'm not talking about new cars. baldnog questioned my budget. i'd rather buy a ef for $1000 and drive the shit out of it till it dies then spend $800 on a ford escort and drive the shit out of it till it dies.
even if they last just as long. however if something goes wrong with the ef i have a hookup on parts, usually free parts. if something goes wrong with the escort, i gotta pay full price for parts.

So basically, by saying ford=fail, what you actually meant was your parts hookup=fail.

Gottcha.

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #26 on:** October 13, 2009, 01:38:50 PM »

gm? Does that stand for gay male? I'm fine with it since you don't run around like this is a gay bar, but dude does your wife know?

Robb · « **Reply #27 on:** October 13, 2009, 02:10:05 PM »

GM= Government Motors.

*paid for with Johnny's paycheck.

snm95ls · « **Reply #28 on:** October 13, 2009, 03:50:57 PM »

Quote from: n/a michael on October 13, 2009, 02:44:39 PM

Quote from: Joseph Davis on October 13, 2009, 01:38:50 PM
gm? Does that stand for gay male? I'm fine with it since you don't run around like this is a gay bar, but dude does your wife know?
wife's always know when their husbands are gay.

Do you know of this from personal experience?

;D

jeffsciv23 · « **Reply #29 on:** October 13, 2009, 03:55:50 PM »

holy shit looks like they made the frame out of rust from older fords

News:

Author Topic: Ranger fail.... edit: its f/s if anyone needs parts lol (Read 8924 times)

rawr