Topic: oh boy.... MOST POWAR EVERZ (Read 204683 times)

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #240 on:** November 17, 2009, 02:38:19 PM »

Quote from: patsmx5 on November 17, 2009, 02:18:11 PM

Quote from: Joseph Davis on November 17, 2009, 02:08:27 PM
Circuitworx/Prodrive fail just as often as the OEM gear fails. The problem is the crank flexing under power and ramming the gear against the housing, not what the gear is made of.
Oh that's just ridiculous. Super fancy strong diamond hard steel oil pump gears in an aluminum housing solves the problem, ask any miata fanboi.

O K

bigdaddyvtec · « **Reply #241 on:** November 17, 2009, 02:53:00 PM »

Quote from: danwjmu on November 17, 2009, 02:23:31 PM

Are you saying he can't "calibrate" his dyno to get reasonably near 700whp?

HAHAHAHAHAH DYNAPACK FTW!!!! LOL.. I thought the smae exact thing...

Anyways:

http://www.cb7tuner.com/vbb/showthread.php?t=148113

danz · « **Reply #242 on:** November 17, 2009, 03:45:01 PM »

Quote from: danwjmu on November 17, 2009, 02:23:31 PM

Are you saying he can't "calibrate" his dyno to get reasonably near 700whp?

all he will have to do to verify it is run the car at the track. it should trap over 140mph easyy with 700whp

danz · « **Reply #243 on:** November 17, 2009, 04:00:14 PM »

Quote from: danwjmu on November 17, 2009, 03:47:38 PM

I would think even higher than that really. He may not even track it when he discovers it isn't doing what he wants it to.

apparently he already has dyno video of the car, and other video as well going off his post on the CB7 forum. i dont think he would have started all these threads if he didnt have something to brag about all day.

Corey · « **Reply #244 on:** November 17, 2009, 04:04:15 PM »

Quote from: danwjmu on November 17, 2009, 03:47:38 PM

I would think even higher than that really. He may not even track it when he discovers it isn't doing what he wants it to.

chances are the manifold is gonna fall apart before it hits the 700whp dynapack calibrated number because he has a heavy ass t4 turbo and a big wastegate hanging off an entirely unbraced 16ga manifold.

d112crzy · « **Reply #245 on:** November 17, 2009, 04:05:52 PM »

It probably is braced to hell, the pics just don't show it because those are OLD pics.

92CXyD · « **Reply #246 on:** November 17, 2009, 04:10:37 PM »

Quote from: danz on November 17, 2009, 04:00:14 PM

Quote from: danwjmu on November 17, 2009, 03:47:38 PM
I would think even higher than that really. He may not even track it when he discovers it isn't doing what he wants it to.

apparently he already has dyno video of the car, and other video as well going off his post on the CB7 forum. i dont think he would have started all these threads if he didnt have something to brag about all day.

My thought exactly in an earlier issue of Super Street he was saying 650bhp was his goal and now its 700bhp.

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #247 on:** November 17, 2009, 04:11:29 PM »

Something wrong that you kids haven't picked up on yet... can you tell me what it is?

Go!

bigdaddyvtec · « **Reply #248 on:** November 17, 2009, 04:12:18 PM »

Open your beaner eyes the manifold was already coated on said pics you nigger lover

Suck my nuts

d112crzy · « **Reply #249 on:** November 17, 2009, 04:20:09 PM »

no vtak solenoid?

snm95ls · « **Reply #250 on:** November 17, 2009, 04:23:44 PM »

No idea.

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #251 on:** November 17, 2009, 04:28:02 PM »

Quote from: snm95ls on November 17, 2009, 04:23:44 PM

No idea.

We've already surmised that, I meant specifically in that picture.

92CXyD · « **Reply #252 on:** November 17, 2009, 04:34:00 PM »

Doesn't say D16z6 on block?

His adj. oil cap is not on there.

Pipe for the wg look like it is not in the correct place.

Plus when the wg opens it only bleeds of exhaust energy from 2 runners

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #253 on:** November 17, 2009, 04:35:27 PM »

It's specifically not in the pictures you posted.

92CXyD · « **Reply #254 on:** November 17, 2009, 04:38:02 PM »

patsmx5 · « **Reply #255 on:** November 17, 2009, 04:38:22 PM »

engine stand fail

snm95ls · « **Reply #256 on:** November 17, 2009, 04:38:59 PM »

Quote from: Joseph Davis on November 17, 2009, 04:28:02 PM

Quote from: snm95ls on November 17, 2009, 04:23:44 PM
No idea.

We've already surmised that, I meant specifically in that picture.

Ok.

Quote from: patsmx5 on November 17, 2009, 04:38:22 PM

engine stand fail

Looks like only two arms holding it on there now that you mention it. Kind of scary.

92CXyD · « **Reply #257 on:** November 17, 2009, 04:40:55 PM »

Oh yeah I have that engine stand its from CSK auto parts and they very marginal stands. ;D

turbob16hatch · « **Reply #258 on:** November 17, 2009, 04:41:57 PM »

Quote from: Joseph Davis on November 17, 2009, 04:11:29 PM

Something wrong that you kids haven't picked up on yet... can you tell me what it is?

Go!

Only thing i can think of is the creepgate, and the sweet o2 sensors right in front of each other and 8" off the turbo.

92CXyD · « **Reply #259 on:** November 17, 2009, 04:45:46 PM »

Would having the O2 sensor off off the turbine housing but before the wg pipe meet back with the exhaust give you messed up AFR at idea or no boost situations?

Teg2boo · « **Reply #260 on:** November 17, 2009, 05:25:27 PM »

Wastegate will hit the downpipe because the flex is not at the good place?

crxvtec91 · « **Reply #261 on:** November 17, 2009, 05:25:53 PM »

It has one of his fail cams in it

dvst8r · « **Reply #262 on:** November 17, 2009, 05:27:39 PM »

02 sensors too close to turbine?

PhilStubbs · « **Reply #263 on:** November 17, 2009, 05:39:36 PM »

I'm not excited about how close the o2 sensors are to the turbo. Innovate says 18" in their manual. 700whp is going to make those sensors pretty hot.

patsmx5 · « **Reply #264 on:** November 17, 2009, 05:52:17 PM »

Quote from: SecksyPeePee on November 17, 2009, 05:39:36 PM

I'm not excited about how close the o2 sensors are to the turbo. Innovate says 18" in their manual. 700whp is going to make those sensors pretty hot.

Yeah. Not only that, but with them being that close to the engine, they're going to affect the exhaust stream exiting the turbine, and cause more backpressure vs. running the sensors further away where they would not significantly affect the flow from the turbine. That said, my Innovate WB is more like 30" from the turbine.

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #265 on:** November 17, 2009, 05:53:59 PM »

Quote from: turbob16hatch on November 17, 2009, 04:41:57 PM

the sweet o2 sensors right in front of each other and 8" off the turbo.

Looks like 2" and 5" respectively to my eyes, but yup that was it.

You are supposed to place wideband sensors a minimum of ten exhaust diameters downstream, which is 30+ inches from the turbine exit. The more those sensors are overheated the leaner they will read.

oinesra · « **Reply #266 on:** November 17, 2009, 06:07:41 PM »

Um, if its an oxygen sensor shouldn't it be on the intake side?

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #267 on:** November 17, 2009, 06:08:54 PM »

Troll.

ryan89crx · « **Reply #268 on:** November 17, 2009, 06:18:47 PM »

Quote from: Joseph Davis on November 17, 2009, 05:53:59 PM

You are supposed to place wideband sensors a minimum of ten exhaust diameters downstream

really? seems like a long ways downstream. i guess mine is about 18" too close lol

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #269 on:** November 17, 2009, 06:34:35 PM »

The concern is overheating the sensor. There isn't really a too far as the sensor heats itself... under any real load the exhaust is travelling really quickly so lag in exhaust getting to the sensor is a non-issue.

News:

Author Topic: oh boy.... MOST POWAR EVERZ (Read 204683 times)

oinesra