:::RHMT::: Real Home Made Turbo

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Official RHMT TANK! that's right i said a TANK! (link)

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Mid engine CRX that never was  (Read 2891 times)

Doug

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8838
  • Get Doug'd biatch
Mid engine CRX that never was
« on: November 27, 2009, 05:31:36 PM »
I wonder why they never came out with this sexy beast?





Logged

CSaddict

  • RHMT Moderator
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10484
Re: Mid engine CRX that never was
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2009, 05:40:37 PM »
They did. It was called a Fiero.
Logged
Your fat ass is just going to drive around in your pile of shit car that is marketed towards 40 yr old recently divorced women trying to be hot shit.

highroller54

  • I caught the fable Novacorn
  • RHMT Moderator
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10830
  • Spreading the rhmt word like PB&J
Re: Mid engine CRX that never was
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2009, 05:42:51 PM »
lol, I came in to say they did it was a nsx. Good work Dave  :P
Logged
Xenocron is a piece of shit.

I solve my problems like an adult, at the strip club drinking on a work night. http://www.competitiondiesel.com/forums/images/smilies/turbo1.gif

Doug

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8838
  • Get Doug'd biatch
Re: Mid engine CRX that never was
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2009, 05:49:16 PM »
Quote from: CSaddict on November 27, 2009, 05:40:37 PM
They did. It was called a Fiero.

Quote from: highroller54 on November 27, 2009, 05:42:51 PM
lol, I came in to say they did it was a nsx. Good work Dave  :P

Calling a Fiero a CRX is sacrilege. A POS Fiero and a NSX is nothing like a CRX.  ::)
Logged

highroller54

  • I caught the fable Novacorn
  • RHMT Moderator
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10830
  • Spreading the rhmt word like PB&J
Re: Mid engine CRX that never was
« Reply #4 on: November 29, 2009, 02:14:15 PM »
Quote from: Doug on November 27, 2009, 05:49:16 PM
Quote from: CSaddict on November 27, 2009, 05:40:37 PM
They did. It was called a Fiero.

Quote from: highroller54 on November 27, 2009, 05:42:51 PM
lol, I came in to say they did it was a nsx. Good work Dave  :P

Calling a Fiero a CRX is sacrilege. A POS Fiero and a NSX is nothing like a CRX.  ::)

a mid engine mule from honda that happened to be called a crx is nothing like a crx princess.
Logged
Xenocron is a piece of shit.

I solve my problems like an adult, at the strip club drinking on a work night. http://www.competitiondiesel.com/forums/images/smilies/turbo1.gif

TTC

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1786
Re: Mid engine CRX that never was
« Reply #5 on: November 29, 2009, 02:16:21 PM »
Part Ferrari part camaro! CAMARRI!
Logged

Jorsher

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8575
Re: Mid engine CRX that never was
« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2009, 06:25:19 PM »
Honda wouldn't release something that cool.

I think now that the S2K is out of production, there will never be a Honda worth buying again, unless you're a soccer mom
Logged

weirtech

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2341
    • Weir Technologies Inc.
Re: Mid engine CRX that never was
« Reply #7 on: November 29, 2009, 10:42:24 PM »
the crz looks cool, but it is going to suck balls.
Logged

Jorsher

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8575
Re: Mid engine CRX that never was
« Reply #8 on: November 29, 2009, 10:46:55 PM »
Quote from: weirtech on November 29, 2009, 10:42:24 PM
the crz looks cool, but it is going to suck balls.

If they tone down its snout, I'll say it looks cool.

Their talk of making it hybrid only and sounding like they don't plan to release an SI model scares me.

A high-strung, 6-speed lsd equipped barebones (relative to the other shit today) little coupe would be fun, but like you said I'm pretty sure it's going to suck balls.
Logged

kgx

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 256
  • MR2fag
Re: Mid engine CRX that never was
« Reply #9 on: November 29, 2009, 11:34:10 PM »
i'm sitting here with that issue on my lap typing this.

apparently it wasn't a concept car of honda's at all. it was something honda contemplated and R&T's staff came up with the idea to get a reader survey to help honda build the thing regarding engines, suspension, etc.

feel free to complete the survey on page 46 and mail it to CRX/R&T, 1499 monrovia ave, newport beach CA 92663.

it may take a while for them to get back to you..


if you actually have that issue in hand, a much more interesting read is the Lotus active suspension article on page 60. there are features for the mk3 supra, FC rx7 and Z31 in that issue as well. why they decided to put that fake CRX on the cover i'll never know.
Logged

Doug

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8838
  • Get Doug'd biatch
Re: Mid engine CRX that never was
« Reply #10 on: November 30, 2009, 02:57:36 AM »
Quote from: highroller54 on November 29, 2009, 02:14:15 PM
Quote from: Doug on November 27, 2009, 05:49:16 PM
Quote from: CSaddict on November 27, 2009, 05:40:37 PM
They did. It was called a Fiero.

Quote from: highroller54 on November 27, 2009, 05:42:51 PM
lol, I came in to say they did it was a nsx. Good work Dave  :P

Calling a Fiero a CRX is sacrilege. A POS Fiero and a NSX is nothing like a CRX.  ::)

a mid engine mule from honda that happened to be called a crx is nothing like a crx princess.

You missed the point completely


Quote from: kgx on November 29, 2009, 11:34:10 PM
i'm sitting here with that issue on my lap typing this.

apparently it wasn't a concept car of honda's at all. it was something honda contemplated and R&T's staff came up with the idea to get a reader survey to help honda build the thing regarding engines, suspension, etc.

feel free to complete the survey on page 46 and mail it to CRX/R&T, 1499 monrovia ave, newport beach CA 92663.

it may take a while for them to get back to you..


if you actually have that issue in hand, a much more interesting read is the Lotus active suspension article on page 60. there are features for the mk3 supra, FC rx7 and Z31 in that issue as well. why they decided to put that fake CRX on the cover i'll never know.

No I just happened to come across the cover. I was a tad bit under the influence when I posted it, but I think it was much better than some of my previous intoxicated post.






Logged

HiProfile

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4564
  • Injector Kingpin
Re: Mid engine CRX that never was
« Reply #11 on: November 30, 2009, 05:39:59 AM »
I have the April 89 Motor Trend where they first showed the NSX. "Variable valve timing" on a "3.0L to 3.3L" dohc v6 is the rumor. Obviously there was enough contemplation for something to come out. However, the 800hp Testarossa in there kinda steals it's thunder...

Anyone else with crx/nsx back issues?
Logged
they mspainted dildoes in my mom'#039#039s hand, in a picture of her in a hospital bed. -JD
dem gurls need some boobz! -Engloid

widebody93

  • Snitch Nigger Deluxe
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 351
  • Widebody93
Re: Mid engine CRX that never was
« Reply #12 on: November 30, 2009, 07:03:38 AM »
BLAH BLAH BLAH  nothin but the =s to BULLSHIT THREAD
Logged

If am a ever retarded enough to get hitched (2x) I would either drink myself to death at my wedding or die trying.

92CXyD

  • Twincharged Smeghead
  • Global Moderator
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6790
  • I look around and all I see is Smegheads
Re: Mid engine CRX that never was
« Reply #13 on: November 30, 2009, 10:58:57 AM »
Quote from: Doug on November 27, 2009, 05:49:16 PM
Quote from: CSaddict on November 27, 2009, 05:40:37 PM
They did. It was called a Fiero.

Quote from: highroller54 on November 27, 2009, 05:42:51 PM
lol, I came in to say they did it was a nsx. Good work Dave  :P

Calling a Fiero a CRX is sacrilege. A POS Fiero and a NSX is nothing like a CRX.  ::)

Yeap Fieros => Pride in Italian and A burning chunck of metal in Spanish. :?:

Feiros= font running of a Chevette in the front, front running gear of Citation in the rear. :?:

The CRX as it was perfect. :yes:
Logged

kgx

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 256
  • MR2fag
Re: Mid engine CRX that never was
« Reply #14 on: November 30, 2009, 01:42:26 PM »
Quote from: 92CXyD on November 30, 2009, 10:58:57 AM
Quote from: Doug on November 27, 2009, 05:49:16 PM
Quote from: CSaddict on November 27, 2009, 05:40:37 PM
They did. It was called a Fiero.

Quote from: highroller54 on November 27, 2009, 05:42:51 PM
lol, I came in to say they did it was a nsx. Good work Dave  :P

Calling a Fiero a CRX is sacrilege. A POS Fiero and a NSX is nothing like a CRX.  ::)

Yeap Fieros => Pride in Italian and A burning chunck of metal in Spanish. :?:

Feiros= font running of a Chevette in the front, front running gear of Citation in the rear. :?:

The CRX as it was perfect. :yes:


The 88 fieros were actually pretty well-sorted, suspension wise. All they needed to do was pick a motor that wasn't an asthmatic boat anchor and it would have been a fantastic car. I used to have a GT and I'll never forget the look on the face of the guy in the C5 as I blew past him on the exit of the carousel at road america. Of course, my exit speed advantage was quickly gobbled up by his HP advantage, but it was still a good time.
Logged

92CXyD

  • Twincharged Smeghead
  • Global Moderator
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6790
  • I look around and all I see is Smegheads
Re: Mid engine CRX that never was
« Reply #15 on: November 30, 2009, 01:52:38 PM »
Yeah not one of Pontiac's brightest ideas spending a 80 million +usd to have Lotus redesign the '88s suspension.
Then make only 5200+ Fiero of which only 1500 GTs then stop because they realize they spent too much. :?:

I always liked the look of them, I even had a '85 SE.

But once I started driving an EG I never want own another Fiero again. :yes:
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »