No what he is saying that there are a lot of laws that are intrusive, not ALL. Like %75 of traffic laws are there to generate revenue, not "protect" anyone. And the over reach the law has, and its openness to interpretation by any judicial employee.
Controlled substances should be just that, CONTROLLED. Just like alcohol and tobacco are. Why is it the governments responsibility to protect me from something that I wish to do? Why is it then, that the legal ramifications are 10x's worse that the effects of the drug? Why is it that we are incarcerating, and housing hundreds of thousands of people (at ~$7 a day of tax money) on bullshit drug charges? Ruining people's lives, seperating families, and exposing these "dopers" to REAL criminals in a prison (kid touchers, killers, etc..).
So jonny you think people should be able to do whatever they want as long as they dont hurt,kill,steal,or damage some one elses property? Thats pretty stupid man. What about a black guy going 90mph in a 30mph zone waving a gun in the air while screaming "white people should die". In your eyes thats cool right, because he did not hurt,kill,steal, or damage someones property.
The failure in your logic is everything. 90 in a 30 is a legitimate threat. So is waving a gun around. That's why we have concealed weapons permits, to CONCEAL them. Things have to be left to interpretation sometimes. It's when you allow thugs like cops to bend the interpretation to fit the actions they WANT to carry out, that you then have a problem.
Oh, and white people should die