Topic: J series ecu (Read 43169 times)

crxvtec91 · « **Reply #30 on:** February 13, 2012, 10:44:27 AM »

Damn that is so badass! BUT this is beyond my level of geek

fe3tcourier · « **Reply #31 on:** February 15, 2012, 06:33:09 PM »

Yeah, I don't like his setup either, but he does, and that's what counts! :-)

I'm a BIG fan of the borg warner design as used on various BMW and Ford diesels. I still want to build one of those one day.

Do you reckon I could sell a few J series plug'n'play setups if I had one drawn up? I could likely get him to test it for me :-)

Would be later in the year, though, before it was fully viable, so might be too late for the niche?

Fred.

PhilStubbs · « **Reply #32 on:** February 15, 2012, 06:35:35 PM »

you might not make a killing, but i bet it would be well worth your time. J swaps are still new.

HiProfile · « **Reply #33 on:** February 15, 2012, 09:10:13 PM »

Quote from: fe3tcourier on February 15, 2012, 06:33:09 PM

Do you reckon I could sell a few J series plug'n'play setups if I had one drawn up? I could likely get him to test it for me :-)

Would be later in the year, though, before it was fully viable, so might be too late for the niche?

Fred.

I recall there being one EMS being developed, then there's MS & AEM, but MS is not plug & play and AEM = $$. If it can be tuned fairly easily with a turbo on it, it should be worth your time. Especially if you're still a broke-ass Assie. JD would give you a better idea, but he's MIA.

92CXyD · « **Reply #34 on:** February 15, 2012, 10:07:52 PM »

Quote from: HiProfile on February 15, 2012, 09:10:13 PM

Quote from: fe3tcourier on February 15, 2012, 06:33:09 PM
Do you reckon I could sell a few J series plug'n'play setups if I had one drawn up? I could likely get him to test it for me :-)

Would be later in the year, though, before it was fully viable, so might be too late for the niche?

Fred.

I recall there being one EMS being developed, then there's MS & AEM, but MS is not plug & play and AEM = $$. If it can be tuned fairly easily with a turbo on it, it should be worth your time. Especially if you're still a broke-ass Assie. JD would give you a better idea, but he's MIA.

I thought Fred was a Kiwi.

J-series FreeEMS P-n-P would be sweet I can have 4 sold right now as long as they do not cost as much as AEM or the RPS's ecu (PnP MegaSquirt with a base tune already)

I have access to a local who is starting do a bit of J-swaps, just wish we had a chassis Dyno local to me.

fe3tcourier · « **Reply #35 on:** February 16, 2012, 10:42:42 AM »

I guess we'll see how the market looks later when the system is mature enough to market like that. Good to know, though :-)

bigdaddyvtec · « **Reply #36 on:** February 16, 2012, 03:56:26 PM »

Quote from: fe3tcourier on February 16, 2012, 10:42:42 AM

I guess we'll see how the market looks later when the system is mature enough to market like that. Good to know, though :-)

Lookup Ried and Andy at Kaizenspeed .com... Andy has a boosted J series to S2K tranny going in his s2k. Its being done very nicely and is quite a slick setup

http://htarchive.net/showthread.php?t=3017287

PhilStubbs · « **Reply #37 on:** February 16, 2012, 04:51:57 PM »

I have been wondering the last few days what tranny could be used with a J for rwd and had the starter on the tranny side. I'll keep that in mind. That's pricey though.

HiProfile · « **Reply #38 on:** February 17, 2012, 10:19:19 AM »

That S2k looks great, but the alum spacer on the crank worries me a bit. It could bite them in the ass if they track the car.

Quote from: 92CXyD on February 15, 2012, 10:07:52 PM

I thought Fred was a Kiwi.

Damn, you're right. Hope you aren't insulted Fred.

PhilStubbs · « **Reply #39 on:** February 17, 2012, 01:11:24 PM »

That does sound sketchy. That's a lot of stress on some long ass bolts

bigdaddyvtec · « **Reply #40 on:** February 17, 2012, 01:43:39 PM »

Quote from: HiProfile on February 17, 2012, 10:19:19 AM

That S2k looks great, but the alum spacer on the crank worries me a bit. It could bite them in the ass if they track the car.

Seriously wrap your brain around it....

Then type why its fine.

jabberwock · « **Reply #41 on:** February 17, 2012, 02:40:13 PM »

Im dumb

HiProfile · « **Reply #42 on:** February 17, 2012, 04:25:13 PM »

Quote from: bigdaddyvtec on February 17, 2012, 01:43:39 PM

Quote from: HiProfile on February 17, 2012, 10:19:19 AM
That S2k looks great, but the alum spacer on the crank worries me a bit. It could bite them in the ass if they track the car.

Seriously wrap your brain around it....

Then type why its fine.

Tell me why they don't use aluminum for gun parts that see lots of sheer forces, vibration, and heat. THen type ~~why it's not fine~~ how you're a dumbass.

jabberwock · « **Reply #43 on:** February 17, 2012, 04:32:12 PM »

The bolts arent aluminum..

Would spacer expansion cause a problem? I mean there are aluminum flywheels and they seem to hold up with a larger radius.

bigdaddyvtec · « **Reply #44 on:** February 17, 2012, 04:49:22 PM »

Quote from: HiProfile on February 17, 2012, 04:25:13 PM

Quote from: bigdaddyvtec on February 17, 2012, 01:43:39 PM
Quote from: HiProfile on February 17, 2012, 10:19:19 AM
That S2k looks great, but the alum spacer on the crank worries me a bit. It could bite them in the ass if they track the car.

Seriously wrap your brain around it....

Then type why its fine.

Tell me why they don't use aluminum for gun parts that see lots of sheer forces, vibration, and heat. THen type ~~why it's not fine~~ how you're a dumbass.

And once again, you have proven your inability to understand the obvious. Enjoy being queer, and more of a retard than... well... ME.

DasPoop · « **Reply #45 on:** February 17, 2012, 06:33:35 PM »

Stock flywheels dont have alignment pins so the bolts take all the sheer forces, if the spacer expanded it would just make the bolts tighter i presume. I will admit those are some long ass bolts to hold a heavy spinning disk but the flywheel should take a majority of the shock loads otherwise it wouldnt be a flywheel by definition

PhilStubbs · « **Reply #46 on:** February 17, 2012, 06:36:21 PM »

i wouldnt trust those bolts to hold that kind of force much above stock hp levels

fe3tcourier · « **Reply #47 on:** February 17, 2012, 09:15:34 PM »

Fuck that :-/

jabberwock · « **Reply #48 on:** February 17, 2012, 10:02:41 PM »

Pussies

DasPoop · « **Reply #49 on:** February 18, 2012, 01:35:26 AM »

I wouldnt worry once its spinning the gyroscopic effect you know it as tq is keeping that disk right where its at.

HiProfile · « **Reply #50 on:** February 18, 2012, 01:54:01 AM »

The aluminum can deform if a clutch grabs too hard, giving the bolts space/play to bend. An alum flywheel is thin where the bolts attach and a large radius around them, so the clamping force keeps the holes from deforming. That spacer has hardly a quarter inch beyond the holes on the TO bearing side where nothing braces it.

It's also between 2 parts that create lots of vibration - one can chatter, the other creates harmonic vibrations. Those WILL make it worse. Aluminum doens't work-harden either, it fatigues.

bigdaddyvtec · « **Reply #51 on:** February 18, 2012, 11:14:24 PM »

Quote from: jabberwock on February 17, 2012, 10:02:41 PM

Pussies

fe3tcourier · « **Reply #52 on:** February 20, 2012, 06:38:35 PM »

Quote from: jabberwock on February 17, 2012, 10:02:41 PM

Pussy

bigdaddyvtec · « **Reply #53 on:** February 21, 2012, 01:54:49 PM »

1:25 in... DO IT.

The Wire: Bunk - "Know what the plural of pussy is?"

jabberwock · « **Reply #54 on:** February 21, 2012, 03:20:08 PM »

Quote from: jabberwock on February 17, 2012, 10:02:41 PM

Pussae

fe3tcourier · « **Reply #55 on:** September 07, 2012, 04:47:26 AM »

FYI, FreeEMS has tested J series native decoding now. Works nicely. Only limitations are the rest of the system :-)

92CXyD · « **Reply #56 on:** September 07, 2012, 10:06:03 AM »

Quote from: fe3tcourier on September 07, 2012, 04:47:26 AM

FYI, FreeEMS has tested J series native decoding now. Works nicely. Only limitations are the rest of the system :-)

Awesome to here, so the kid (engine #10) in Wyoming w/ twin turbo v-6 accord got everything working well?

fe3tcourier · « **Reply #57 on:** September 07, 2012, 01:09:26 PM »

Yeah, he sent me a datalog that looked good :-)

Later we'll knock out a fast-start version that uses both cams, but it only affects starting, and it's already pretty quick to start, so not a priority.

92CXyD · « **Reply #58 on:** September 07, 2012, 02:01:43 PM »

Quote from: fe3tcourier on September 07, 2012, 01:09:26 PM

Yeah, he sent me a datalog that looked good :-)

Later we'll knock out a fast-start version that uses both cams, but it only affects starting, and it's already pretty quick to start, so not a priority.

May need to get a hold of him, if I keep getting tuning J-series for boost inquiries.

fe3tcourier · « **Reply #59 on:** September 07, 2012, 08:56:55 PM »

You could, or you could get hold of me! :-p

News:

Author Topic: J series ecu (Read 43169 times)