:::RHMT::: Real Home Made Turbo

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Daspoop/Trevor YOU WILL BE MISSED, RIP (link)  :'(

Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Newest record  (Read 9081 times)

d-rail

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Newest record
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2009, 01:14:07 AM »

WOOOOOOD
Logged

notfastcrx

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 192
Re: Newest record
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2009, 01:21:26 AM »

such a sick install.

d-rail

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Newest record
« Reply #3 on: July 02, 2009, 01:29:29 AM »

The whole setup is sweet as hell and the way they did the valve cover is fucking awesome.
Logged

chris

  • Guest
Re: Newest record
« Reply #4 on: July 02, 2009, 01:45:37 AM »

Fuckin Vitara's are nasty
Logged

t_cel_t

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3147
Re: Newest record
« Reply #5 on: July 02, 2009, 02:09:57 AM »

Fuckin Vitara's are nasty
qft

when do we get to see it wasting a blue devil
Logged
malone labe

I think all cop cars need to have turbo. nbspnbsp Then they would understand the necessity of putting your foot down and how uncontrollable the urge is to fucking rail on that shit.

crttaz

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1831
  • Old Wise One
Re: Newest record
« Reply #6 on: July 02, 2009, 02:58:19 AM »

what was the slew rate???? 22-25?
Logged
OG before the OG'#039#039s

Corey

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3030
Re: Newest record
« Reply #7 on: July 02, 2009, 03:08:03 AM »

its a dynapack. thats a mid 400hp car at best on a roller dyno.

nice setup regardless.
Logged

d-rail

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Newest record
« Reply #8 on: July 02, 2009, 03:16:59 AM »

its a dynapack. thats a mid 400hp car at best on a roller dyno.

nice setup regardless.

I disagree. If setup correctly dynapacks are the best in the field. There is only 1 that I would say reads stupid high off the top of my head but I cant even remember the name of it.
Logged

chris

  • Guest
Re: Newest record
« Reply #9 on: July 02, 2009, 03:21:19 AM »

Church's dyno


Dyno's are tools and vary. Plenty of ways to cheat them also



If the car run's 9's thats what matters



Power is in the head. Good #'s whoever ported the head.
Logged

d-rail

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Newest record
« Reply #10 on: July 02, 2009, 03:51:55 AM »

If that thing runs 9's i'd shit. Makin that kind of power will probably be hard to put to the ground from what I've seen without a really nice suspension setup and an excellent driver.
Logged

crttaz

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1831
  • Old Wise One
Re: Newest record
« Reply #11 on: July 02, 2009, 04:18:40 AM »

its a dynapack. thats a mid 400hp car at best on a roller dyno.

nice setup regardless.

I disagree. If setup correctly dynapacks are the best in the field. There is only 1 that I would say reads stupid high off the top of my head but I cant even remember the name of it.

That high reading dynapack can be brought into line if the slew settings are shared.

I've seen a high compression LS go from 140whp to 160 whp just by changing the slew settings.

Unless everyone uses the same settings, you cannot compare the Dynapack numbers, but the are a GREAT tuning tool, if not the best for loading and no slippage.
Logged
OG before the OG'#039#039s

d-rail

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Newest record
« Reply #12 on: July 02, 2009, 04:24:26 AM »

its a dynapack. thats a mid 400hp car at best on a roller dyno.

nice setup regardless.

I disagree. If setup correctly dynapacks are the best in the field. There is only 1 that I would say reads stupid high off the top of my head but I cant even remember the name of it.

That high reading dynapack can be brought into line if the slew settings are shared.

I've seen a high compression LS go from 140whp to 160 whp just by changing the slew settings.

Unless everyone uses the same settings, you cannot compare the Dynapack numbers, but the are a GREAT tuning tool, if not the best for loading and no slippage.

I trust what you say but even if they were fuckin with the slew for better numbers, They couldn't have played with it enough to make a HUGE differance IMO. 30-50 horse is the most I've seen fucked out of those dyno's.
Logged

Corey

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3030
Re: Newest record
« Reply #13 on: July 02, 2009, 04:29:28 AM »

its a dynapack. thats a mid 400hp car at best on a roller dyno.

nice setup regardless.

I disagree. If setup correctly dynapacks are the best in the field. There is only 1 that I would say reads stupid high off the top of my head but I cant even remember the name of it.

That high reading dynapack can be brought into line if the slew settings are shared.

I've seen a high compression LS go from 140whp to 160 whp just by changing the slew settings.

Unless everyone uses the same settings, you cannot compare the Dynapack numbers, but the are a GREAT tuning tool, if not the best for loading and no slippage.

I trust what you say but even if they were fuckin with the slew for better numbers, They couldn't have played with it enough to make a HUGE differance IMO. 30-50 horse is the most I've seen fucked out of those dyno's.

evans dynapack reads 100+hp higher then a dynojet. youre kidding yourself if you think its only 30hp.





Logged

d-rail

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Newest record
« Reply #14 on: July 02, 2009, 04:33:32 AM »

dynojet's are the highest reading I've ever seen. The only other dyno I'd trust besides a dynopac is a Mustang dyno. Your an idiot if you think their is 100 horse difference.
Logged

Corey

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3030
Re: Newest record
« Reply #15 on: July 02, 2009, 04:41:30 AM »

dynojet's are the highest reading I've ever seen. The only other dyno I'd trust besides a dynopac is a Mustang dyno. Your an idiot if you think their is 100 horse difference.

yes dynojets are def the highest reading  ::)

car makes 745@31psi on evans dynapack and traps 140mph

goes to nrg tech for a retune and it makes 680@29psi on a super duper high reading dynojet and proceeds to trap 144

so the car made 65 less hp on a dynojet and trapped 4 mph higher. yea youre right, dynapacks dont read high or anything.

oh and before the retune we took the car to a dynojet to see how high dynapacks really read. it made 745@31psi on a dynapack and it made 596@26psi on a dynojet.



« Last Edit: July 02, 2009, 04:45:24 AM by Corey »
Logged

d-rail

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Newest record
« Reply #16 on: July 02, 2009, 04:48:37 AM »

dynojet's are the highest reading I've ever seen. The only other dyno I'd trust besides a dynopac is a Mustang dyno. Your an idiot if you think their is 100 horse difference.

yes dynojets are def the highest reading  ::)

car makes 745@31psi on evans dynapack and traps 140mph

goes to nrg tech for a retune and it makes 680@29psi on a super duper high reading dynojet and proceeds to trap 144

so the car made 65 less hp on a dynojet and trapped 4 mph higher. yea youre right, dynapacks dont read high or anything.

oh and before the retune we took the car to a dynojet to see how high dynapacks really read. it made 745@31psi on a dynapack and it made 596@26psi on a dynojet.





I'd have to see proof to believe that shit. I'm really not trying to be an ass but most people I've talked to have preferred a dynopack over anything else because of accuracy unless it's a diesel in which case they proffered other dyno's.
Logged

Corey

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3030
Re: Newest record
« Reply #17 on: July 02, 2009, 04:52:25 AM »

dynojet's are the highest reading I've ever seen. The only other dyno I'd trust besides a dynopac is a Mustang dyno. Your an idiot if you think their is 100 horse difference.

yes dynojets are def the highest reading  ::)

car makes 745@31psi on evans dynapack and traps 140mph

goes to nrg tech for a retune and it makes 680@29psi on a super duper high reading dynojet and proceeds to trap 144

so the car made 65 less hp on a dynojet and trapped 4 mph higher. yea youre right, dynapacks dont read high or anything.

oh and before the retune we took the car to a dynojet to see how high dynapacks really read. it made 745@31psi on a dynapack and it made 596@26psi on a dynojet.





I'd have to see proof to believe that shit. I'm really not trying to be an ass but most people I've talked to have preferred a dynopack over anything else because of accuracy unless it's a diesel in which case they proffered other dyno's.

why would i make this stuff up? the only thing a dynapack has on a roller dyno is the fact that its a hub dyno so you dont have issues with tire spin. i would never trust dynapack numbers, itll only leave you dissapointed when you go to the track.
Logged

d-rail

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Newest record
« Reply #18 on: July 02, 2009, 04:56:25 AM »

dynojet's are the highest reading I've ever seen. The only other dyno I'd trust besides a dynopac is a Mustang dyno. Your an idiot if you think their is 100 horse difference.

yes dynojets are def the highest reading  ::)

car makes 745@31psi on evans dynapack and traps 140mph

goes to nrg tech for a retune and it makes 680@29psi on a super duper high reading dynojet and proceeds to trap 144

so the car made 65 less hp on a dynojet and trapped 4 mph higher. yea youre right, dynapacks dont read high or anything.

oh and before the retune we took the car to a dynojet to see how high dynapacks really read. it made 745@31psi on a dynapack and it made 596@26psi on a dynojet.





I'd have to see proof to believe that shit. I'm really not trying to be an ass but most people I've talked to have preferred a dynopack over anything else because of accuracy unless it's a diesel in which case they proffered other dyno's.

why would i make this stuff up? the only thing a dynapack has on a roller dyno is the fact that its a hub dyno so you dont have issues with tire spin. i would never trust dynapack numbers, itll only leave you dissapointed when you go to the track.

I don't know you so why wouldn't you lie? I'm not saying your wrong but I've seen what I've seen and truck dynapack over anything and the only other I trust is a mustang. But I would guess that the biggest thing would be proper calibrations
Logged

Corey

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3030
Re: Newest record
« Reply #19 on: July 02, 2009, 05:01:45 AM »

i dont benefit from proving dynapacks read high, i have no reason to lie. its my buddys car. when that car goes to the track and traps 135mph ill believe that dyno doesnt read high.

what are the specs on that setup? what turbo? how much boost? whats in the head?
Logged

d-rail

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Newest record
« Reply #20 on: July 02, 2009, 05:07:54 AM »

Go to d-series.org. Has all the specs on the car. Read everything and you'll believe the dyno pedro. Here's the link to the whole car bub:    http://d-series.org/forums/forced-induction/113062-speedfactory-09-vitara-d16-build.html
Logged

Corey

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3030
Re: Newest record
« Reply #21 on: July 02, 2009, 05:19:55 AM »

eh maybe hes got that one properly calibrated. i didnt realize it was a 6262 and he had the custom length rods to up the compression, 550 isnt terribly unbelievable. still doesnt change the fact that most dynapacks read high, even if that one is properly calibrated.
Logged

d-rail

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Newest record
« Reply #22 on: July 02, 2009, 05:28:06 AM »

I'm not saying your wrong and I'm right on this shit, I'm just going by what I've seen just like you. I just have my own preference like everyone else I recon. REGARDLESS that fucking car is sick. I want a valve cover like he has. It makes perfect sense.
Logged

BangBusMaster

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 199
Re: Newest record
« Reply #23 on: July 02, 2009, 07:41:15 AM »

I personally watched two cars from that Dynapack make considerably less power on a Dynojet.  I would take a Dynapack over a Dynojet, but the diff. needs to be figured out. 
Logged

92CXyD

  • Twincharged Smeghead
  • Global Moderator
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 6789
  • I look around and all I see is Smegheads
Re: Newest record
« Reply #24 on: July 02, 2009, 09:35:03 AM »

Go to d-series.org. Has all the specs on the car. Read everything and you'll believe the dyno pedro. Here's the link to the whole car bub:    http://d-series.org/forums/forced-induction/113062-speedfactory-09-vitara-d16-build.html

Good read even though I still have reservations about Bisi's cams. :?:

Towdogg

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2834
  • Cfm's don't roll through an air intake!
Re: Newest record
« Reply #25 on: July 02, 2009, 10:00:38 AM »

 ;)  Dirty Ds done dirt cheap...........   :P
Logged

j.h.christ

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6347
  • Compl3x is a giant faggot
Re: Newest record
« Reply #26 on: July 02, 2009, 10:07:02 AM »

I personally watched two cars from that Dynapack make considerably less power on a Dynojet.  I would take a Dynapack over a Dynojet, but the diff. needs to be figured out. 

you talking about vadim's and joe's shit? i saw it too.
Logged
http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/8090/lolcart.gif
"quotquotI spent most of my money on booze and women. The rest I just wasted."quotquot

SloS13

  • RHMT Ex-President
  • Administrator
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: I am a geek!!
  • My avatar is broken
Re: Newest record
« Reply #27 on: July 02, 2009, 10:50:59 AM »

dyno's will read extra high if you are going downhill because gravity is making horsepower/tq
Logged

dvst8r

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3737
  • Unobtainium
Re: Newest record
« Reply #28 on: July 02, 2009, 11:22:22 AM »

Call it what you want to call it, the car made ~470whp last year and went mid 10s @ 139mph @ 2600lbs. On the SAME dyno it just made almost 100whp more.

Hi, low or other dynapacks are very repeatable, as such I see a car that will now have a chance at 9s, on vitara's.
Logged
There are two kinds of people: Sheep and sharks. Sharks are winners and they don'#039#039t look back '#039#039cause they don'#039#039t have necks. Necks are for sheep.

Joseph Davis

  • Verbal Assault Technician
  • RHMT Moderator
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34733
  • Eugenics prevents retards like widebody93
    • TURBO THIS
Re: Newest record
« Reply #29 on: July 02, 2009, 11:51:21 AM »

its a dynapack. thats a mid 400hp car at best on a roller dyno.

nice setup regardless.

I disagree. If setup correctly dynapacks are the best in the field. There is only 1 that I would say reads stupid high off the top of my head but I cant even remember the name of it.

That high reading dynapack can be brought into line if the slew settings are shared.

I've seen a high compression LS go from 140whp to 160 whp just by changing the slew settings.

Unless everyone uses the same settings, you cannot compare the Dynapack numbers, but the are a GREAT tuning tool, if not the best for loading and no slippage.

Yup.  All of the dyno reps (except the shady Dynojet liars) at PRI agreed that the Dynapack 4000 was all around the best dyno made, "but since you can't afford one - no offense, no one can - let me show you what our unit has to offer."
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up