Dumbass cop shouldnt have been going that speed without his lights on. Driver should have judged cops speed better, but this is the cops fault, plain and simple.
What if it were the other way around, with 2 hondas with one flying by the other at 90+, hitting a cop making a turn.
When making a left hand turn across a roadway with oncoming traffic you are supposed to wait until it is safe to cross, the drivers CHOICE to save a few seconds of time to turn ahead of the oncoming vehicle was a poor choice, sure you can argue the issue was compounded by the excessive speed of the officer, but that does not negate from the main issue of the now deceased drivers decision to cross the street when he was not capable of determining if it was safe to cross the street or not. IF you are not capable of determining this
You completely fail to understand. Sure the driver OBVIOUSLY wasn't capable of determining a large number of aspects being discussed here - what makes you think they weren't entirely confident they'd made the correct choice?
You guys are falling prey media boosted propaganda that the law enforcement is an evil entity, part of a socialist plot no doubt, enjoy the sheets over your eyes.
No, actually, I'm falling prey to my rather considerable knowledge of cognitive function and learning styles, based in no small part by a couple dozen books on the subject. I couldn't add, subtract, multiply, or divide until the seventh grade, dude. I was sitting in college calculus three years later, and it was pretty awkward when some days I wouldn't be able to do simple addition for whatever reason, because my brain was and still is flaky like that.
The subject of driving skill, and an individual's perception of their possession of it, is a classic example in texts discussing cognitive function. You don't understand what I am talking about (I lost you at meta-cognitive) and therefore you argue on the presumption that I am wrong when it is
you who in fact does not know what he's talking about.
Just saying.