Topic: 383 sTrOkEr (Read 85285 times)

Conceptz-X · « **Reply #30 on:** March 31, 2009, 09:34:18 PM »

not a bad price, I had one shortened about 10 years ago, think it cost about that much.

hotrex · « **Reply #31 on:** March 31, 2009, 09:37:50 PM »

Quote from: junkyard racer on March 31, 2009, 08:59:00 PM

Quote from: hotrex on March 31, 2009, 08:18:02 PM
and...... no one cares

havent seen a build out of your ass lately.

dont u worry about me.

random-strike · « **Reply #32 on:** March 31, 2009, 09:47:10 PM »

Quote from: hotrex on March 31, 2009, 09:37:50 PM

Quote from: junkyard racer on March 31, 2009, 08:59:00 PM
Quote from: hotrex on March 31, 2009, 08:18:02 PM
and...... no one cares

havent seen a build out of your ass lately.

dont u worry about me.

we're worried about you

Conceptz-X · « **Reply #33 on:** March 31, 2009, 09:48:02 PM »

hotrex · « **Reply #34 on:** March 31, 2009, 09:50:54 PM »

iv e got a lil something in my garage... not as gay as a 383 but its something

1Fast68 · « **Reply #35 on:** March 31, 2009, 11:56:09 PM »

I'm sorry, but there is no chance in hell that thing is gonna make 450-475 hp. 218@.050 is fucking baby as is the .490 lift

The only thing its got going for it is 11:1 compression , but don't detonate that bitch or those plastic pistons are done.

Good on you for building a V8, bad on you for dreaming its going to make that much power. You'll be lucky to see a cunt hair over 1 hp / 1 CI and reach the 400 mark, and like i said, that would be lucky.

Corey · « **Reply #36 on:** April 01, 2009, 12:03:52 AM »

johnny how much did you save buying hyperpathetic pistons over a set of forged ones. youre a pussy if you dont at least put a 100 shot on it. good luck with that tranny with the increased power, my buddys 4l60 didnt know how to shift after the turbo was installed, not sure why that was.

random-strike · « **Reply #37 on:** April 01, 2009, 12:24:27 AM »

Quote from: 1Fast68 on March 31, 2009, 11:56:09 PM

I'm sorry, but there is no chance in hell that thing is gonna make 450-475 hp. 218@.050 is fucking baby as is the .490 lift

The only thing its got going for it is 11:1 compression , but don't detonate that bitch or those plastic pistons are done.

Good on you for building a V8, bad on you for dreaming its going to make that much power. You'll be lucky to see a cunt hair over 1 hp / 1 CI and reach the 400 mark, and like i said, that would be lucky.

i've built a lot of v8s thanks though

you're the god of motors eh... LT1 makes damn near 400crank hp stock. get over it.

375-400rwhp is what i'm shooting for.

this is a street motor sunday driver

Quote from: Corey on April 01, 2009, 12:03:52 AM

johnny how much did you save buying hyperpathetic pistons over a set of forged ones. youre a pussy if you dont at least put a 100 shot on it. good luck with that tranny with the increased power, my buddys 4l60 didnt know how to shift after the turbo was installed, not sure why that was.

maybe sometime or a s/c.

these pistons are like 20 bucks a piece. HE pistons are good for NA because they are very lightweight

i love how everyone here is such an expert on everything. DuEDeE DaT WuN'T MaUke ThUsAnd Hp DwAg

the car will be pretty fast with this motor in it.

http://www.grandsportregistry.com/dyno.htm

random-strike · « **Reply #38 on:** April 01, 2009, 12:26:31 AM »

j.h.christ · « **Reply #39 on:** April 01, 2009, 12:37:06 AM »

Quote from: random-strike on April 01, 2009, 12:24:27 AM

LT1 makes damn near 400crank hp stock. get over it.

hahahahaha

what lt1 makes near 400 hp stock

random-strike · « **Reply #40 on:** April 01, 2009, 12:39:48 AM »

Quote from: j.h.christ on April 01, 2009, 12:37:06 AM

Quote from: random-strike on April 01, 2009, 12:24:27 AM
LT1 makes damn near 400crank hp stock. get over it.

hahahahaha

what lt1 makes near 400 hp stock

400 CRANK hp

and i said near.

the late model ones in the vettes with alum heads do. and LT4s are right 400hp or more at the crank.

patsmx5 · « **Reply #41 on:** April 01, 2009, 12:40:44 AM »

Quote from: 1Fast68 on March 31, 2009, 11:56:09 PM

I'm sorry, but there is no chance in hell that thing is gonna make 450-475 hp. 218@.050 is fucking baby as is the .490 lift

The only thing its got going for it is 11:1 compression , but don't detonate that bitch or those plastic pistons are done.

Good on you for building a V8, bad on you for dreaming its going to make that much power. You'll be lucky to see a cunt hair over 1 hp / 1 CI and reach the 400 mark, and like i said, that would be lucky.

Glad someone said this. I was like

when I saw the numbers he threw out.

random-strike · « **Reply #42 on:** April 01, 2009, 12:46:03 AM »

Quote from: patsmx5 on April 01, 2009, 12:40:44 AM

Quote from: 1Fast68 on March 31, 2009, 11:56:09 PM
I'm sorry, but there is no chance in hell that thing is gonna make 450-475 hp. 218@.050 is fucking baby as is the .490 lift

The only thing its got going for it is 11:1 compression , but don't detonate that bitch or those plastic pistons are done.

Good on you for building a V8, bad on you for dreaming its going to make that much power. You'll be lucky to see a cunt hair over 1 hp / 1 CI and reach the 400 mark, and like i said, that would be lucky.

Glad someone said this. I was like when I saw the numbers he threw out.

everyone is an expert :somb:

random-strike · « **Reply #43 on:** April 01, 2009, 12:51:02 AM »

http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/tech/0612_chpp_1996_chevy_corvette_lt4_bullet_engine/index.html

Quote

This week at work we finally got an engine running on the dyno that had been pushed back many times by other projects. It was the original development engine for the GM Performance Parts HOT engine. It started life as a '96 LT4 Corvette bullet. We developed a cam for GM (the HOT cam) and worked with them on the dual-plane carbureted intake for the Gen II reverse-flow-cooling engines. We freshened up the engine, zero-decked the block, cleaned up the cylinder heads (minor porting), and bored the block 0.020 inch over. With the zero deck and the shave of the heads, the final compression ratio came out at 11:1. The final home for this engine is my bracket-racing '80 Malibu wagon. Back in 1996, when we originally built the engine, it produced 420 hp and ran extremely well in my '65 El Camino.

get a clue faggots.

http://www.dougrippie.com/drm/engine_conversion.htm

here is a douge rippie 383 lt1 with stock heads, intake, 450 horsepower/435 ft-lbs.

Quote from: c0mpl3x on April 01, 2009, 12:49:47 AM

lt1 vettes came from the factory at 330hp factory rating.

gran turismo taught us this

lol

Travis · « **Reply #44 on:** April 01, 2009, 01:08:42 AM »

John, why didn't you go with a TH350?

random-strike · « **Reply #45 on:** April 01, 2009, 01:24:19 AM »

cause the one in it has overdrive and its in there

LS1pwNzJ00 · « **Reply #46 on:** April 01, 2009, 05:32:46 AM »

Quote from: 1Fast68 on March 31, 2009, 11:56:09 PM

I'm sorry, but there is no chance in hell that thing is gonna make 450-475 hp. 218@.050 is fucking baby as is the .490 lift

The only thing its got going for it is 11:1 compression , but don't detonate that bitch or those plastic pistons are done.

Good on you for building a V8, bad on you for dreaming its going to make that much power. You'll be lucky to see a cunt hair over 1 hp / 1 CI and reach the 400 mark, and like i said, that would be lucky.

Yeah that is a baby cam, i didnt even notice it. Get a bigger one, shit i have a 232 234 on a 112

junkyard racer · « **Reply #47 on:** April 01, 2009, 07:21:22 AM »

Quote from: hotrex on March 31, 2009, 09:50:54 PM

iv e got a lil something in my garage... not as gay as a 383 but its something

another dirt bike

Ntrain2k · « **Reply #48 on:** April 01, 2009, 07:48:04 AM »

Quote from: random-strike on March 31, 2009, 08:49:13 PM

stock trans

why would i use a different trans?

it has a 4l60e

it has different rear end gears already

Do yourself a favor and go ahead and order a HD rebuild kit with the updated sun gear shell/cage.

You'll know you need it when you suddenly have no overdrive and reverse.

The 4L60E can be a good tranny once it has been rebuilt correctly.

Lowerit · « **Reply #49 on:** April 01, 2009, 10:55:02 AM »

Quote from: Ntrain2k on April 01, 2009, 07:48:04 AM

Quote from: random-strike on March 31, 2009, 08:49:13 PM

stock trans

why would i use a different trans?

it has a 4l60e

it has different rear end gears already

Do yourself a favor and go ahead and order a HD rebuild kit with the updated sun gear shell/cage.

You'll know you need it when you suddenly have no overdrive and reverse.

The 4L60E can be a good tranny once it has been rebuilt correctly.

+1 I rock a LT1 Caprice Wagon as a tow car, the cage is cheap cast shit. Had 2 Lt1 wagons, both of them replaced due to failure. I think the guy swapped in Truck parts.

They tend to shift a little bit mushy too, but otherwise over 500,000 miles between 2 Lt1's and never an issue.

As for LT4's making 400Hp? Maybe with some mods, not stock... sorry if I am late to the party on this one.

Lt1's..

Caprice and Impala SS , iron head 2 Bolt 260hp 9caprice is actually less due to crank driven fan) Iron heads outflow the alum ones.

F-bodies are alum heads 285Hp

Vettes (Lt1) are 300hp and have 4 bolt mains

LT4's standard on 6spd Collectors editions (auto's had Lt1's) and standard on Grandsports... Had different Intake and heads (not sure if the cam was the same thou) 330Hp.

throw away the opti spark or vent yours.

If you need any LT1 parts holla, I have 2 sitting in the garage and an Lt4 still in the crate

They are my old mans...but I can pretend to be baller.

PS swap the cam , you aren't at 400hp with that setup.. not trying to argue or compare E-Dicks.. I think you are 375ish ... Cam would really make that Bitch come alive.

other then that...nice setup.

LS1pwNzJ00 · « **Reply #50 on:** April 01, 2009, 11:20:23 AM »

we all know they dont make 400hp, johnny likes to exaggerate, which is why we make fun of him.

salesmonkey · « **Reply #51 on:** April 01, 2009, 12:47:19 PM »

he did say crank hp, so give him some credit at least for not claiming a huge whp like most people do. sure he might be a bit off but hes going to be pretty close to his numbers when hes done. only way to see is wait...and then the shit talking can really begin.

random-strike · « **Reply #52 on:** April 01, 2009, 01:11:00 PM »

Quote from: Lowerit on April 01, 2009, 10:55:02 AM

PS swap the cam , you aren't at 400hp with that setup.. not trying to argue or compare E-Dicks.. I think you are 375ish ... Cam would really make that Bitch come alive.

right, so you think its going to make 275rwhp. which is stock or lower than stock.

i could put these up all day but everyone would still go off gran turismo hp figures ;D

stock lt4

stock lt4, tuned

1Fast68 · « **Reply #53 on:** April 01, 2009, 01:38:39 PM »

LT1's and LT4's aren't the same thing, so no reason to go posting numbers LT4 cars make as they will be higher than you anyways.

for comparison sake, you say your going to make 400 RWHP

My motor is

340 cid
10:1
230/230 @.050 480/480
Performer RPM heads (240 cfm @.500)
Aig gap intake
750 holley DP
1 5/8 - 1 3/4 step headers, 3" Exh. with X pipe to the bumper

Car goes 12.50's all day long, its a bracket car, not meant to be fast.

and for the numbers ...... 280rwhp @5800 , 280RWTQ @4800 On a mustang dyno, so figure 300 on a DJ.

I have more cam, probably more head flow, surely a less restrictive exhaust. So where do you plan on coming up with this extra 100 WHP?

random-strike · « **Reply #54 on:** April 01, 2009, 01:43:22 PM »

Quote from: 1Fast68 on April 01, 2009, 01:38:39 PM

LT1's and LT4's aren't the same thing, so no reason to go posting numbers LT4 cars make as they will be higher than you anyways.

for comparison sake, you say your going to make 400 RWHP

My motor is

340 cid
10:1
230/230 @.050 480/480
Performer RPM heads (240 cfm @.500)
Aig gap intake
750 holley DP
1 5/8 - 1 3/4 step headers, 3" Exh. with X pipe to the bumper

Car goes 12.50's all day long, its a bracket car, not meant to be fast.

and for the numbers ...... 280rwhp @5800 , 280RWTQ @4800 On a mustang dyno, so figure 300 on a DJ.

I have more cam, probably more head flow, surely a less restrictive exhaust. So where do you plan on coming up with this extra 100 WHP?

cubic inches, compression, and rpms?

you have a hard time reading don't you? i said 450-475 crank hp. thats aprox 350-375rwhp. which is what it'll make i bet. with a bigger cam i could make 400rwhp easily

a stock LT4 makes more power than your motor. why would anyone build a 340 with 10:1 compression and NOT PUT IT IN A TRUCK LOL

that motor of yours belongs in a old ass ram dualie hauling hay

Ntrain2k · « **Reply #55 on:** April 01, 2009, 01:46:23 PM »

Quote from: random-strike on April 01, 2009, 01:43:22 PM

why would anyone build a 340 with 10:1 compression and NOT PUT IT IN A TRUCK LOL

Apparently you are rather unfamilliar with the Mopar 340.........

http://www.allpar.com/mopar/mopar340.html

http://www.moparmusclemagazine.com/techarticles/engine/mopp_0310_340_engine_600_hp/index.html

random-strike · « **Reply #56 on:** April 01, 2009, 01:48:36 PM »

Quote from: Ntrain2k on April 01, 2009, 01:46:23 PM

Quote from: random-strike on April 01, 2009, 01:43:22 PM
why would anyone build a 340 with 10:1 compression and NOT PUT IT IN A TRUCK LOL

Apparently you are rather unfamilliar with the Mopar 340.........

no i'm not.

a 340 sixpack in a challenger might have been fast in 1970. but they are not powerful motors in today's world.

a 70 challenger with a 340sixpack runs 15s at best

i smoked a challenger with a engine similar to this guys in my old shitty integra. and by smoked i mean 747 lengths. they are dogs

Lowerit · « **Reply #57 on:** April 01, 2009, 01:52:46 PM »

He seems to be unfamiliar with a lot.. Sure has a fuckin boatload of attitude thou.

Posting up Internet Dyno Charts FTW!!!

A stock LT1 will make mid 250's @ the wheels

a stock Lt4 will make mid 270's.

Funny , you know everything about LT1's and I am the one sitting at GM head office with a garage full of them.

you know all , just ask u.

random-strike · « **Reply #58 on:** April 01, 2009, 01:57:22 PM »

Quote from: Lowerit on April 01, 2009, 01:52:46 PM

He seems to be unfamiliar with a lot.. Sure has a fuckin boatload of attitude thou.

Posting up Internet Dyno Charts FTW!!!

A stock LT1 will make mid 250's @ the wheels

a stock Lt4 will make mid 270's.

Funny , you know everything about LT1's and I am the one sitting at GM head office with a garage full of them.

you know all , just ask u.

i'm specifically talking about the LT1s in corvettes. not in fucking caprices

you're a liar about 250@ the wheels. gran turismo said lt 1 camaros make 295hp which means it makes 195rwhp. liar.

Ntrain2k · « **Reply #59 on:** April 01, 2009, 02:06:44 PM »

Quote from: random-strike on April 01, 2009, 01:48:36 PM

no i'm not.

a 340 sixpack in a challenger might have been fast in 1970. but they are not powerful motors in today's world.

a 70 challenger with a 340sixpack runs 15s at best

i smoked a challenger with a engine similar to this guys in my old shitty integra. and by smoked i mean 747 lengths. they are dogs

I'm pretty sure a 70 challenger with a 6 pack 340 runs a bit better then 15's........lol

http://www.ravenentertainment.com.au/docs/340enginebuildnumbers.pg.pdf

Quote from: Above link

The street versions had a 340
topped with an Edelbrock manifold and three
Holley two-barrels. It was rated at 290 bhp,
but likely made 350 and was potent enough
for high 13-second ETs.

If you beat one in your N/A integra I suggest you try running someone who is actually racing you next time.

News:

Author Topic: 383 sTrOkEr (Read 85285 times)

junkyard racer