:::RHMT::: Real Home Made Turbo

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

AJ's 1966 Nova LSX twin turbo build! (link)

Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Ranger fail.... edit: its f/s if anyone needs parts lol  (Read 6342 times)

turbostd

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1986
Ranger fail.... edit: its f/s if anyone needs parts lol
« on: October 11, 2009, 11:09:37 PM »

So i was putting brakes on my friend kyles 98 ranger when i found this on the passenger side  :o Yes that is a bolt welded to the uca holding it to the frame  ::) We tried to weld the crack up but keep blowing through the frame lol. On top of that moving the rubber brake line half an inch to the left cause the metal line under the truck to start leaking.



« Last Edit: October 17, 2009, 07:44:24 PM by turbostd »
Logged

Ravage70

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6286
  • The Hotrex foot. Stiletto ready!
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #1 on: October 11, 2009, 11:25:26 PM »

98 or 89?
That think looks like a deathtrap.
Logged

snm95ls

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3662
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #2 on: October 11, 2009, 11:27:38 PM »

We had one come into work one day with the rear leaf spring shackle mounts rusted off of the frame.  It was a death for sure.

Just a rusty pile of fuck.

turbostd

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1986
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #3 on: October 11, 2009, 11:32:39 PM »

ya its kinda sad really the body is almost perfect on the thing yet the underside is done. His s10 was the opposite the body was toast but the frame and running gear was perfect lol
Logged

t_cel_t

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3147
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #4 on: October 12, 2009, 12:47:20 AM »

ford=fail
Logged
malone labe

I think all cop cars need to have turbo. nbspnbsp Then they would understand the necessity of putting your foot down and how uncontrollable the urge is to fucking rail on that shit.

brine04

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2251
  • B-North
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #5 on: October 12, 2009, 12:57:34 AM »

Logged
92GSR - mild interest

bigdaddyvtec

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8948
  • Go outside and play hide and go fuckyourself
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #6 on: October 12, 2009, 01:32:26 AM »

Just sold my 93 with 58K on the clock last night.


Good by FORD, Hello Isuzu... PIcs to come.   Have 3 hhundo or so in the Ranger, Got 2 Gs for it.  Picking up a 94 Isuzu Rodeo SPort with V6, NEw clutch, really clean new oversize tires and shit... REALLY dont want to get sticuk in some fucking gay ass winter like last year up here without 4WD...

Id have kept the ranger if it was 4wd... But its Not...  The leafspring thing is known about them...

That thikng looks like shit underneath, mine looks (looked) fine
Logged
http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh166/joeymisanthropy/Misce/TURBOTHIS.jpg

H series 35 pounds... Will turn you out!
 ---GFI we build FAST---

rawr

  • Guest
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #7 on: October 12, 2009, 06:37:35 AM »

Welcome to Ohio, salt and the reason I don't want to own any more old shit up here. :-\
Logged

E-b0la

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2276
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #8 on: October 12, 2009, 10:17:35 AM »

northeast = rust

that sucks. Just sell the truck to some schmuck get something else before it fails again.
Logged

Robb

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4624
  • Meat Popsicle
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #9 on: October 12, 2009, 10:19:55 AM »

ford=fail

Right, thats why there are more mustangs running sub 10 second 1/4 times than any car on the planet.
« Last Edit: October 12, 2009, 11:11:46 AM by Robb »
Logged

blowoff valves are for pussies.

t_cel_t

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3147
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #10 on: October 12, 2009, 11:46:00 AM »

Just sold my 93 with 58K on the clock last night.


Good by FORD, Hello Isuzu... PIcs to come.   Have 3 hhundo or so in the Ranger, Got 2 Gs for it.  Picking up a 94 Isuzu Rodeo SPort with V6, NEw clutch, really clean new oversize tires and shit... REALLY dont want to get sticuk in some fucking gay ass winter like last year up here without 4WD...

Id have kept the ranger if it was 4wd... But its Not...  The leafspring thing is known about them...

That thikng looks like shit underneath, mine looks (looked) fine

you know thats a gm right
Logged
malone labe

I think all cop cars need to have turbo. nbspnbsp Then they would understand the necessity of putting your foot down and how uncontrollable the urge is to fucking rail on that shit.

turbostd

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1986
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #11 on: October 12, 2009, 12:05:47 PM »

didnt some of those Isuzus have honda motors in them  ???  anyhow the Isuzus seem pretty nice a friend of mine has a 95 trooper with the 3.2 sohc v6. Runs good and has decent power but the valvetrain is noisy as hell. Wonder how those motors would do with boost? They have the gm 60 degree trans pattern and i have a 92 s10 that has a failtastic 2.8 in it that needs some loven.
Logged

Joseph Davis

  • Verbal Assault Technician
  • RHMT Moderator
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34733
  • Eugenics prevents retards like widebody93
    • TURBO THIS
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #12 on: October 12, 2009, 12:36:02 PM »

ford=fail

Right, thats why there are more mustangs running sub 10 second 1/4 times than any car on the planet.
any car can be built with AFTERMARKET parts to run fast.

Yeah, but stock 351W still eat 700 whp all day long, so take the hater cock out of your ass.  There's a lot that's RIGHT with Fords, I'd rather own one than a newer Honda.


didnt some of those Isuzus have honda motors in them  ??? 


None.

patsmx5

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1584
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #13 on: October 12, 2009, 12:40:28 PM »

Some honda's had isuzu engines, but not the other way around.

Ford has done a lot right. Yes the've built their fair share of shit and then some. But a lot of their trucks are purpose built and very stout from the factory. And +1 to the mustang, they've done a lot right with it too.
Logged
Quote: Originally Posted by Adam Hopkins
There is no such thing as too much boost. You could have too little rod, piston, or sleeve. But never too much boost.

patsmx5

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1584
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #14 on: October 12, 2009, 12:46:36 PM »

Yeah, but stock 351W still eat 700 whp all day long
Really?
Logged
Quote: Originally Posted by Adam Hopkins
There is no such thing as too much boost. You could have too little rod, piston, or sleeve. But never too much boost.

Joseph Davis

  • Verbal Assault Technician
  • RHMT Moderator
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34733
  • Eugenics prevents retards like widebody93
    • TURBO THIS
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #15 on: October 12, 2009, 01:56:04 PM »

Yeah, but stock 351W still eat 700 whp all day long
Really?

Look up "football rod" truck blocks.  And yeah, they'll make that power, but stock piston reliability is like a 350 whp GSR's... they last for a while, or not, and then the lands go.

Robb

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4624
  • Meat Popsicle
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #16 on: October 12, 2009, 03:46:23 PM »

Yeah, but stock 351W still eat 700 whp all day long
Really?

Look up "football rod" truck blocks.  And yeah, they'll make that power, but stock piston reliability is like a 350 whp GSR's... they last for a while, or not, and then the lands go.

Then you buy $150 worth of forged pistons and some MHG's, turn the boost up and laugh at faggot slow literbikes as you pass them with the entire cast of 90210 in your car.
Logged

blowoff valves are for pussies.

Joseph Davis

  • Verbal Assault Technician
  • RHMT Moderator
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34733
  • Eugenics prevents retards like widebody93
    • TURBO THIS
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #17 on: October 12, 2009, 04:40:57 PM »

I didn't know you could be picky about what you drive on your budget, Michael.

Joseph Davis

  • Verbal Assault Technician
  • RHMT Moderator
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34733
  • Eugenics prevents retards like widebody93
    • TURBO THIS
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #18 on: October 12, 2009, 04:46:09 PM »

I never bought tires, Michael.  That was the problem.

Robb

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4624
  • Meat Popsicle
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #19 on: October 12, 2009, 05:50:08 PM »

I didn't know you could be picky about what you drive on your budget, Michael.
cars that break down a lot (fords) cost more to own cause you are always fixing something.


Sir, here you suggest that fords are unreliable.  The question I pose to you is, what exactly is considered reliable in this day and age?  They dont make 92-95 civics anymore...

Logged

blowoff valves are for pussies.

LS1pwNzJ00

  • FagoJon is queer bait
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4064
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #20 on: October 12, 2009, 06:36:07 PM »

ford=fail

Right, thats why there are more mustangs running sub 10 second 1/4 times than any car on the planet.
any car can be built with AFTERMARKET parts to run fast.

Yeah, but stock 351W still eat 700 whp all day long, so take the hater cock out of your ass.  There's a lot that's RIGHT with Fords, I'd rather own one than a ANY HONDA






Fixed.  I hate fords because they are designed so fucking retarded, not that GM's are designed much better, but they are designed a bit better.  the only ford i'd own is a 03-04 cobra.  Fuck everything else
Logged
http://<ltltimg src="quotquothttp://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l3b3icaMwV1qzy9ouo1_500.jpg"quotquot nbspnbsp width="quotquot200"quotquot height="quotquot400"quotquot>gtgt

patsmx5

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1584
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #21 on: October 12, 2009, 06:43:19 PM »

I like the early/mid 90's F series fords. We've got a 93' F150 with ~190K on the odometer. Truck is hauling something whenever it's running, gets about 10K a year put on it, and it never complains. Everything int he fucker is stock, never done shit to it. A/C is ford cold, 351 pulls good. Hasn't had an oil change in years, but it doesn't complain. Ford ain't got a conscious. Just runs.
Logged
Quote: Originally Posted by Adam Hopkins
There is no such thing as too much boost. You could have too little rod, piston, or sleeve. But never too much boost.

bluerex

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 165
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #22 on: October 12, 2009, 07:01:02 PM »

I've been beating the shit out of '80's fords from the beginning and probably will for the next 10 years.  I've sunk a total of probably less than $400 (including purchase) in my dd '83 ranger in the last two years.   

Joseph Davis

  • Verbal Assault Technician
  • RHMT Moderator
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34733
  • Eugenics prevents retards like widebody93
    • TURBO THIS
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #23 on: October 12, 2009, 07:24:59 PM »

I didn't know you could be picky about what you drive on your budget, Michael.
cars that break down a lot (fords) cost more to own cause you are always fixing something.


Sir, here you suggest that fords are unreliable.  The question I pose to you is, what exactly is considered reliable in this day and age?  They dont make 92-95 civics anymore...



The question I pose Michael is why the fuck did he buy a Ford Falcon if he hates them so much?

turbostd

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1986
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #24 on: October 12, 2009, 10:19:26 PM »

heres some pics from underneath lol this frame is done for. I told him to ether look for another frame or another truck that needs a motor or trans haha.




Logged

Robb

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4624
  • Meat Popsicle
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #25 on: October 13, 2009, 08:39:13 AM »

I didn't know you could be picky about what you drive on your budget, Michael.
cars that break down a lot (fords) cost more to own cause you are always fixing something.


Sir, here you suggest that fords are unreliable.  The question I pose to you is, what exactly is considered reliable in this day and age?  They dont make 92-95 civics anymore...



The question I pose Michael is why the fuck did he buy a Ford Falcon if he hates them so much?

it's a fairlane old man, i didn't buy it my wife did. she bought it cause she liked the way it looked.
now she wants to sell it cause it's a pos

robb: i'm not talking about new cars. baldnog questioned my budget. i'd rather buy a ef for $1000 and drive the shit out of it till it dies then spend $800 on a ford escort and drive the shit out of it till it dies.
even if they last just as long. however if something goes wrong with the ef i have a hookup on parts, usually free parts. if something goes wrong with the escort, i gotta pay full price for parts.

So basically, by saying ford=fail, what you actually meant was your parts hookup=fail.

Gottcha.
Logged

blowoff valves are for pussies.

Joseph Davis

  • Verbal Assault Technician
  • RHMT Moderator
  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34733
  • Eugenics prevents retards like widebody93
    • TURBO THIS
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #26 on: October 13, 2009, 01:38:50 PM »

gm? Does that stand for gay male?  I'm fine with it since you don't run around like this is a gay bar, but dude does your wife know?

Robb

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4624
  • Meat Popsicle
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #27 on: October 13, 2009, 02:10:05 PM »

GM= Government Motors.





















































*paid for with Johnny's paycheck.  :noel:
Logged

blowoff valves are for pussies.

snm95ls

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3662
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #28 on: October 13, 2009, 03:50:57 PM »

gm? Does that stand for gay male?  I'm fine with it since you don't run around like this is a gay bar, but dude does your wife know?
wife's always know when their husbands are gay.

Do you know of this from personal experience?

 ;D

jeffsciv23

  • Certified OG
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6787
Re: Ranger fail....
« Reply #29 on: October 13, 2009, 03:55:50 PM »

holy shit looks like they made the frame out of rust from older fords
Logged
Quote

The OP just called me a nigger in the for sale section do the mods allow this kind of thing to happen around here?
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up