Topic: rhmt trolling motor (Read 11824 times)

DSharp · « **on:** August 06, 2013, 11:30:12 PM »

rowing sucks dixs

92CXyD · « **Reply #1 on:** August 06, 2013, 11:38:39 PM »

Well does it work, have ya tried it?

ratcityrex · « **Reply #2 on:** August 07, 2013, 12:44:56 AM »

It will cavitate. It will spin at to high of a rpm. Any you dropped your oatmeal on the ground.

HiProfile · « **Reply #3 on:** August 07, 2013, 12:42:35 PM »

I'd think a 4cyl trimmer would be best, lower RPM & higher torque. My guess is he's not going for speed records, so it wouldn't be run a full RPM. Those things idle around 1200rpm, the speed the prop was designed for, so I don't think 3-4k will cavitate too bad. I think the biggest issue will be burning the clutch if no weights are added.

HiProfile · « **Reply #4 on:** August 07, 2013, 12:46:23 PM »

Technically this would be called a reed wacker...

PhilStubbs · « **Reply #5 on:** August 07, 2013, 03:13:30 PM »

I'm interested to see how it goes, but yea, the rom is way too high to be properly efficient. It will still move though.

jabberwock · « **Reply #6 on:** August 07, 2013, 04:02:05 PM »

I think the load will keep the rpms down

DSharp · « **Reply #7 on:** August 07, 2013, 06:17:56 PM »

well see tomorrow, I have been thinking about putting a cone behind and possibly in front of the prop and smoothing things out. if it works at all its a hell of a lot cheaper than an outboard

ratcityrex · « **Reply #8 on:** August 07, 2013, 06:28:29 PM »

Quote from: DSharp on August 07, 2013, 06:17:56 PM

if it works at all its a hell of a lot cheaper than an outboard

So at what point is noise a factor in fishing? Is that 2 stroke wound out gonna be loude enough to scrae the fish away? At any rate its way less than a electric outboard.

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #9 on:** August 08, 2013, 10:20:29 AM »

Quote from: jabberwock on August 07, 2013, 04:02:05 PM

I think the load will keep the rpms down

Good point. I know the load is what makes your mom go down.

HiProfile · « **Reply #10 on:** August 08, 2013, 12:55:43 PM »

Quote from: Joseph Davis on August 08, 2013, 10:20:29 AM

Quote from: jabberwock on August 07, 2013, 04:02:05 PM
I think the load will keep the rpms down

Good point. I know the load is what makes your mom go down.

ZING!

n/a mike · « **Reply #11 on:** August 08, 2013, 09:56:08 PM »

So did we get trolled or is it a trolling motor?
it's not supposed to be fast, it's for trolling.
you can pick up a trolling motor on CL for about the same it would cost to make what you did.
except you probably had the shitty wacker laying in your back yard.

Phate · « **Reply #12 on:** August 08, 2013, 11:47:32 PM »

Ripper vids?

Zombie killing vids?

DSharp · « **Reply #13 on:** August 09, 2013, 12:39:11 AM »

this thing needs a reduction gear box, the motor doesnt have the torque to spin it direct drive. im just gonna buy a dam outboard.

jabberwock · « **Reply #14 on:** August 09, 2013, 12:54:50 AM »

Smaller prop?

DSharp · « **Reply #15 on:** August 09, 2013, 07:13:56 PM »

maybe a big rc boat prop.

Joseph Davis · « **Reply #16 on:** August 21, 2013, 03:00:23 PM »

Nitromethane?

Travis · « **Reply #17 on:** August 22, 2013, 11:25:54 PM »

minnkota prop?

HiProfile · « **Reply #18 on:** August 23, 2013, 09:58:44 AM »

Just keep chopping a 1/2" off the blade tips til it works. If it spins at 3x the speed, it only needs 1/3 the prop.

PhilStubbs · « **Reply #19 on:** August 23, 2013, 10:02:03 AM »

That idea would work better if you could put 2 blades in there clocked 90Â° apart. Smaller diameter and high rpm needs more blades.

HiProfile · « **Reply #20 on:** August 26, 2013, 09:24:01 AM »

More blades in the water requires more torque to move them. They "bite" more, and also create more drag.

PhilStubbs · « **Reply #21 on:** August 26, 2013, 09:29:34 AM »

If all you did was make those 2 tiny blades smaller it would cavitate and do nothing. 4 smaller blades would be easier to spin than the 2 bigger ones and he might have a chance of forward motion.

Ntrain2k · « **Reply #22 on:** August 26, 2013, 07:20:42 PM »

Quote from: PhilStubbs on August 23, 2013, 10:02:03 AM

That idea would work better if you could put 2 blades in there clocked 90Â° apart. Smaller diameter and high rpm needs more blades.

180 degrees apart I hope?

PhilStubbs · « **Reply #23 on:** August 26, 2013, 08:52:59 PM »

90Â° would be better. 180Â° would put them in the same place as the others

DSharp · « **Reply #24 on:** August 31, 2013, 04:29:49 PM »

I did shave down the prop, turned the weed eater wide open and shoved the prop down on the concrete lol, I even went through the trouble of sanding the edges smooth. still too much drag from the high rpms. My 2 hp sizuki outboard works much better. anyone ever put a tuned pipe on a 2 stroke outboard?

jabberwock · « **Reply #25 on:** August 31, 2013, 10:14:55 PM »

Quote

rhmt trolling thread

News:

Author Topic: rhmt trolling motor (Read 11824 times)